RDT---
I won't try to give you hard evidence, because as I have said before, "There are some things which can't be 'proven' to another, but can only be proven to oneself." Simply because that is the nature of it.
That's also why it would be silly to try to enforce anything in that realm with laws. The physical universe just doesn't apply there, and Science involves only physical universe things, per it's own definition of itself, at this time.
Physical universe stuff can, and
must stand the tests of proof (by
agreed upon definition of Science, as is found in a standard dictionary). Merely because that is the agreement. Physical reality
is agreement.
But here goes, anyway---
As an example, there is the theory that, "Function follows form." But that is merely part of the long standing PsyOp that I mentioned before. Actually, form follows function. This, of course, flys in the face of both the Darwinists and the Creationists. (And you know what I think of "multiple choice" limitations, anyway!)
Also the theory of conservation of energy is wrong. This you can prove to yourself. Once you have experienced it, there is no doubt. But to prove it to another person is impossible. Even if you did show someone, it would be classified as mere "Parlor Tricks," and would be of no help whatsoever. Maybe give somebody a heart attack or something, though; which just isn't necessary, and would be messy. So why bother fooling with it?
So, to just to answer your question: To imply that astronomical objects affect sentient beings, would be unethical. And to use trickery to persuade others to believe that they do, would be totally unethical.
It's that simple.
