WWII Bayonet

fyrffytr1

Gold Member
🥇 Charter Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
7,669
Reaction score
12,467
Golden Thread
0
Location
Southwest Georgia
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, White's DFX
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting

Attachments

  • 20180616_214215.webp
    20180616_214215.webp
    190.2 KB · Views: 77
  • 20180616_214233.webp
    20180616_214233.webp
    177.3 KB · Views: 66
  • 20180616_214307.webp
    20180616_214307.webp
    142.4 KB · Views: 141
  • 20180616_214356.webp
    20180616_214356.webp
    193.1 KB · Views: 77
  • 20180616_214537.webp
    20180616_214537.webp
    131.2 KB · Views: 124
I believe it’s for an M1, made by Union Fork & Hoe (U.F.H.), U.S. is below with a bomb thingy between the letters.
 

Upvote 0
Upvote 0
I believe it’s for an M1, made by Union Fork & Hoe

Thanks. Is there any significance to the symbol. It reminds me of Artillery or Ordnance.
I have looked at pages of bayonets and while I am in complete agreement about it's identity I can't seem to find a 16" size scabbard made of Leather(?) with a metal throat and tip. I know it's nit-picking but I would like to find one like mine. Or, could it have the wrong scabbard?
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
The flaming bomb symbol on the back side is a Ordnance acceptance mark. The scabbard you have is an M1917 bayonet scabbard which were originally issued with Model 1917 Enfield bayonets so technically it is not the correct scabbard. During WWII there was a mix of WWI and WWII equipment being used so it is possible this pair has been together for some time. Both are in similar shape, personally I would keep it together as is.

Steve
 

Upvote 0
The flaming bomb symbol on the back side is a Ordnance acceptance mark. The scabbard you have is an M1917 bayonet scabbard which were originally issued with Model 1917 Enfield bayonets so technically it is not the correct scabbard. During WWII there was a mix of WWI and WWII equipment being used so it is possible this pair has been together for some time. Both are in similar shape, personally I would keep it together as is.

Steve

Thanks for the info. After closer inspection I found the "MS" mark on the scabbard. I read on another web site that were many, many more M1917 scabbards made than there were bayonets so it is possible that these two have been together from day 1.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0
Yeah. It's pretty much "mix-and-match". I believe the bayonet to fit a 1896 .30-40 Krag would also fit the 1903 Springfield, the P-17 Enfield, the M1 Garand, etc. At least the US military got standardization of bayonets down. I'm not sure when 10" became the standard but it was that by war's end.
 

Upvote 0
Nice find! Getting one in it's original length is always good. they cut most of them down to 10 inch blades starting in 1943.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom