aarthrj3811
Gold Member
That tells me a lot. That tool will out perform any signal generator.Hell they charge more for the phony piece of calculator taped to an antenna
That tells me a lot. That tool will out perform any signal generator.Hell they charge more for the phony piece of calculator taped to an antenna
Why don't you read the post from other 50 people who have told us how their devices work for them?Why does no one believe in Long Range locators?
Why don't you read the post from other 50 people who have told us how their devices work for them?
Those are photo’s of a 2002 model TG. They are much different from your fake ones
View attachment 1245133
Yes it isWait that is A REAL device As in a device someone is USING?
That’s not what the expert skeptic said in his testI can see that what it is PRETENDING to do is get the "frequency" from the calculator and radiate it out through the antenna, but the problem is that the frequency of the calculator is ALWAYS the same regardless of what is on the screen.
It is a HP 6S SolarThe frequency is the frequency of the quartz crystal itself, which if it even has one is probably around 1mhz, but I'd be surprised if it even had one in it... I bet it doesn't.
Just maybe he understands MathematicsIt is clear that the person who built this device does not understand electronics.
Yes there is. What kind of toaster is that?In comparison let me show you a device in which I contributed a bit ... notice the obvious difference between my photo and the "rangertell"?
So my bank excepts the money from my find so are they just a pretend backer?I'm sorry to say I think you have been taken advantage of if you purchased that device.
Anyone with even the slightest knowledge of electronics can see that calculator, and the "circuitry" inside the Examiner, do nothing useful. Calculators, in general, do have a fixed-frequency "clock" signal that runs the calculator circuitry, but the frequency is not altered by any key strokes. So the claim that the calculator provides a signal with a programmable frequency is false.
The web site goes on to claim that the calculator couples to the circuitry inside the black box via induction, with the meandering piece of wire as the primary side of the "transformer". But this piece of wire is not connected to anything, and therefore is not part of any closed circuit, and cannot possibly support inductive coupling. Because there is no circuitry either inside the calculator, or inside the black box, that could operate as a transformer, Ranger appeals to Tesla in an attempt to explain away the obvious lack of any real induction mechanism. So, the calculator taped to the top of the box cannot possibly relay any "signal" to the inside of the box.
What about the rest of the circuit? It's just a few odd components soldered together to appear "technical". The claim that the components form some sort of resonance circuit which is somehow tuned by the numbers punched into the calculator is false. The silliness of this claim is underscored by Ranger's insistence that, once again, the circuit is of the "Tesla" variety, and not understood by normal science. Such statements are the norm in all sorts of other pseudoscience, and a sure sign that the claims are bogus.
In RealScience, a resonance circuit would never include a series diode, which would specifically block resonance from occurring. And, in RealScience, resistance is the mortal enemy of a resonant circuit, yet Ranger has two pots in the loop, which add up to a whopping 12.4k-ohms. Pretty much guaranteeing that, even if the diode is removed, there ain't gonna be any resonance. But, again, even ignoring the fact that the circuit cannot possibly resonate, the notion that numbers punched into a disconnected calculator will change the tuning of a fixed-component circuit is just plain quackery.
No. that’s where they get all the fake photo’s.. I am talking about the one that was posted on this board.Do you mean this skeptic:
No. that’s where they get all the fake photo’s.. I am talking about the one that was posted on this board.
That’s funny. I have 120 mil volts running between my hands. My left hand is the negative and can easily be measuredThis is complete BS. There is no "modulating of the code" by the calculator, that is just not true at all. The display is always refreshed at the same frequency regardless of what is displayed. Then, there is no "magnetic and electrical field" of your body, that is also BS. When was the last time you moved a magnet without touching it? A compass needle?
Try the device sometime. Look at the body to provide the power and look at the wiring.There is no "base frequency" in the detector because it has no power source.
Or they are happy with the device they boughtThe reason they can't claim they've been scammed is because there are a million excuses by the sellers placing the blame in the operator's hands.
So... Did you try the experiment? Now you want to talk about Idemotor response. Mine is very well trained and not involuntaryhe pendulum example you gave is a great example. What you stated there is simply not true, but how does the average person argue with such ridiculousness? Take that metal pendulum and hang it from a fixed object. Touch it with whichever hand you like, it will not swing in ANY direction without YOU swinging it. That is simply because it will swing the direction you want it to swing when it is in your hand because you are moving your hand to make it do so.
More excuses.As for the body's magnetic field and your left hand being negative, that is also not true. What you are seeing is a side effect of the analog to digital converter inside a digital meter. You are simply charging your skin like a capacitor with the digital meter's current output, this is why it's fluctuating, and increasing over time.
Try it with an analog meter and you'll find it won't work!
No I do notDo you sell these devices aarthrj?
No excuses and no video. You can learn the truth by hanging anything from a string. I know the 1852 definition of Idomotor will get in your way but this is 2015 and we know that ideomotor is and can be trained. For some reason the skeptic think we have to do everything. I put things on here that has proved what they say is BS. They can do the experiments and find out for themselves. That’s the way real people do thingsPlease share that video. Or, make another excuse.