Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Bergie said:I saw the story...she was dumb for turning down the $2 million, which may not even be on the table any longer. It will never be proven to be a Pollack, so she may as well take what she can get. By the way, all Pollack did was splash paint on a canvas with a brush. It's not really even painting...
TreasureTales said:Is it some ugly thing? I swear some of the ugliest artwork is the most valuable. Ever notice on Antiques Roadshow how the truly ugly print or earthenware jug will be worth the most? I usually buy things that appeal to me, but from now on I'm buying the ugliest pieces of art I can find. Nothing over $5.00, either!!
DJ_Quinn said:There is treasure to be had at a bargain lads, but its getting harder to find all the time. People are scouring the thrift shops, f;lea markets and car boot sales for the diamond in the rough.
So, Pollak's style doesn't appeal to everyone, I like him but I don't understand the ammount of money that his work commands. Frankly, I'm baffled. Art is a funny business, and one in which there are more critics making a living than artists.
Does anybody have a link to this work by Pollak? I'd like to check it out.
BTW, what do the critics think of my Henry Darger:
Very Nice!!!!!!!!!
xstevenx