What's new

A Little California Gold with SDC 2300

Steve Herschbach

Hero Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2005
Messages
659
Reaction score
1,017
Golden Thread
0
Location
Nevada
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Chris Ralph and I spent the last couple days at a location he knew of, each of us with our SDC 2300 detectors. We found 79 nuggets totaling nearly a half ounce in total. Chris got the most gold, as is fitting since it is his location - thanks Chris! I got 27 nuggets at 5.3 grams total. The smallest piece in lower right hand corner is only 0.7 grains on my freshly calibrated digital powder scale. That's 0.045 grams. The largest nugget is 0.67 grams. Great little machine for pulling small gold out of hot ground. Yeah, other detectors would have found some of this gold. I am not trying to convince anyone otherwise. The point is the SDC does it and does it easily, with no fuss or muss, no magic settings or coils, and virtually no ground or hot rock response.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    image.webp
    117.5 KB · Views: 207
Chris Ralph and I spent the last couple days at a location he knew of, each of us with our SDC 2300 detectors. We found 79 nuggets totaling nearly a half ounce in total. Chris got the most gold, as is fitting since it is his location - thanks Chris! I got 27 nuggets at 5.3 grams total. The smallest piece in lower right hand corner is only 0.7 grains on my freshly calibrated digital powder scale. That's 0.045 grams. The largest nugget is 0.67 grams. Great little machine for pulling small gold out of hot ground. Yeah, other detectors would have found some of this gold. I am not trying to convince anyone otherwise. The point is the SDC does it and does it easily, with no fuss or muss, no magic settings or coils, and virtually no ground or hot rock response.

Ive said it before, you da man Steve! Doesnt hurt having a geologist like Chris as a friend! Nice to see real gold finds posted, not a nugget someone bought on ebay & claimed they found!
 
Chris Ralph and I spent the last couple days at a location he knew of, each of us with our SDC 2300 detectors. We found 79 nuggets totaling nearly a half ounce in total. Chris got the most gold, as is fitting since it is his location - thanks Chris! I got 27 nuggets at 5.3 grams total. The smallest piece in lower right hand corner is only 0.7 grains on my freshly calibrated digital powder scale. That's 0.045 grams. The largest nugget is 0.67 grams. Great little machine for pulling small gold out of hot ground. Yeah, other detectors would have found some of this gold. I am not trying to convince anyone otherwise. The point is the SDC does it and does it easily, with no fuss or muss, no magic settings or coils, and virtually no ground or hot rock response.
Steve, I notice that you have many different gold machines, including the GPX5000 and the Garrett ATX among others. How does the 2300 compare to them?
 
Steve, I notice that you have many different gold machines, including the GPX5000 and the Garrett ATX among others. How does the 2300 compare to them?

The problem is there is no perfect detector for all tasks. I try to figure out what a detector is best at, and use it for that. My main detectors and why:

Minelab GPX 5000 - Handles largest range of gold sizes for most depth in widely varying ground conditions. This the detector I use to look for nuggets at maximum depth in the worst ground conditions or for covering lots of ground fast with larger coils.

Minelab SDC 2300 - Excels at pulling gold out of shallow ground, hits a bit smaller gold than GPX 5000. Also more compact with built in speakers and batteries, unlike GPX. This detector is rapidly becoming my primary prospecting detector. There are far more place with small gold than large gold.

Garrett ATX - Great all around unit, less expensive alternative to Minelab units. Pretty heavy for prospecting so this has become my preferred beach and underwater unit due to waterproof design.

White's TDI - Also less expensive alternative to Minelab units. However, between the three units above I find I am just not using the TDI any more, so it may be up for sale soon. Don't get me wrong, it is a good detector, but basically nothing about it makes me want to take it and leave the others behind.

That is my basic methodology. I get each new prospecting unit as they become available, assuming I think they may add some capability I do not have. I toss them in the mix, and see how it works out. At the end of the day I want to find gold, so after an initial testing and learning phase the detector has to provide a compelling reason for me to use it, or it just sits around after awhile. Enough of that and I may as well sell it to make room for the next contender.
 
Very pretty gold there , makes me wish I was in "Gold Country" !!!
 
Thanks Steve, How about the different Gold Bugs through the years. I've always thought they were a very good unit for the price. Given the competition out there, one of the higher priced units might make more sense however. Do you still use a Gold Bug with those other weapons in your arsenal? How about the earlier Minelabs like the SD series?
 
Since you asked about the SDC I was focused on PI units.

I still use a Gold Bug 2 and probably always will. It is a classic and indispensable detector for finding the smallest gold and especially for checking quartz samples for enclosed gold. Though I must admit the SDC goes a long way towards bridging the gap between the Gold Bug 2 and the PI detectors, which have historically not been as hot on tiny gold. The SDC gets close but without the problems the Gold Bug 2 has with mineralization and hot rocks.

The Gold Bug Pro is my "go to" detector for hunting gold in trashy locations. Though I am thinking of upgrading to the F19 to further enhance that ability to pick gold out of trashy areas. The Gold Bug Pro is also a nice light-weight scouting detecting for rough terrain, especially steep hillsides. The Gold Bug Pro is my recommended unit for people new to prospecting who want to stay well under the $1000 mark. If you can't find gold with it then perhaps prospecting is not your thing. If you can, then maybe a higher price unit would be a good investment.

I have owned each Minelab PI detector, upgrading as they came out. Each one is just a bit better than the last, barely enough to justify an upgrade from one to the next, but the overall advance has been significant. The GPX 5000 takes ground balancing PI technology about as far as it can go. The only thing left there is to make them smaller, lighter, and less expensive. Or move on to the next big thing, whatever that is. Many people still use earlier Minelab models with great success and used ones are a good option. I still have a soft spot for the GP 3500, the last of the pure analog models.
 
Thanks Steve, that reinforces my thoughts on the Gold Bug 2. Although I haven't used the Gold Bug Pro yet, in looking at the specs, it appears that Fisher is trying to make an all-purpose machine out of it. The F19 gives me similar pause. For small gold, the higher frequency of the GB2 looks to be an advantage over the other two....as is the convertibility to a hip mount. They don't make a coil for the 5000 that will allow it to compete with the "small gold" machines?
 
It is not a coil thing. The electronics in each detector determines the minimum detectable size. Coils only help to a certain point. I can put any tires I want on my truck and it still won't be a sports car.

Nothing wrong with all purpose as long as it performs. The Gold Bug Pro easily hits larger gold deeper than a Gold Bug 2. It is all about trade-offs.
 
Some more California gold from a different location, which I found once again with the SDC 2300. Weight 11.2 grams or about 1/3 ounce.
 

Attachments

  • image.webp
    image.webp
    76.2 KB · Views: 127
Nice! looks like they were a little more downstream. :notworthy:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom