THE TRUE SEEKER
Jr. Member
- #61
Thread Owner
The following are negative views regarding pirate treasure.
Charles Grey
Rebecca Simon
Patrick Pringle
Benerson Little
The summary of their view is that pirates did not often plunder inorganic treasures like gold and gems. Because they divided the loot equally, pirate captains did not amass enormous wealth, and such treasures were spent immediately after distribution. Even if they were not spent, there would be no reason to bury them.
Here is my counterargument: The pirates in Madagascar plundered large quantities of gold and gems. There were no places in Madagascar to spend all this wealth, so the treasure was stored there until it could be used for trade with European ships. Furthermore, the pirates faced numerous dangers and threats in Madagascar. By citing examples from around the world, I have shown that burying one's assets to protect them was a common practice for people in such precarious situations. I agree that pirate captains didn't get their hands on vast fortunes. What I'm picturing is treasure buried by ordinary pirates.
Tim TraversBuried Treasure
The question of buried pirate treasure is an exciting one, but unfortunately very few pirates buried any treasure for a number of reasons. First, and most important, very few pirates managed to keep any of their treasure, because it was all spent in gambling, drinking, womanising, and other pleasures, so that there was nothing left to bury. Secondly, many ships that were seized contained items that could not easily be buried, such as bales of cotton, calico, muslin, and silk, provisions, bulky goods, wine, brandy, spices, and of course, slaves. Thirdly, when pirates did capture treasure such as jewelry, gold dust, bars of silver, and so on, it was shared out very carefully among the pirate crew, so that no large amount was left to bury. Fourthly, when pirates returned to their ports or sought protection for their treasure in different safe locations, they had to pay off greedy and corrupt colonial Governors, such as Nicholas Trott of the Bahamas, and with what was left usually tried to turn their treasure into land or property or ships, so again there was nothing left to bury. Fifthly, even if there was some treasure buried, it would be recovered quite quickly by the pirates who buried it. Sixthly, although some pirates such as Henry Avery's men in the Red Sea, collected between £700 and £1,000 pounds each, others often made very little. So of course, there was nothing for them to bury. In one case, there was not enough treasure to go around a group of pirates on St Mary's Island, Madagascar. The loot was supposed to be distributed to 14 pirates by Captains Tew, Rayner, Mason and Coats, but there simply wasn't enough to distribute, so these 14 pirates formed themselves into two groups of seven men each, and fought it out. The result was that 'one of the said Sevens were all killed, and five of the others, so that the two which survived Enjoyed the whole Booty. 61 Finally, the buried treasure that does exist is usually to be found in children's stories (Treasure Island), or in film versions of what pirates were supposed to do with their plunder (Blackbeard the Pirate, 1952).
I've looked into the treasure looted by Madagascar pirates before; they often got a share of several hundred pounds each. (And they also frequently looted gold, silver, and jewelry.)
Last edited:







