I want one!Tag is labeled 2.5 inch cannonball. It's seemed pretty heavy for its size. Any ideas to it's authenticity? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks.
View attachment 2255759View attachment 2255761View attachment 2255762View attachment 2255760
Thanks, could it be British? I didnt end up buying it so I can't weigh it.You would need the exact diameter (use a caliper) and weight to be able to even try to ID it as an artillery shot.
If indeed it's 2.5 inches I don't see a solid shot that size in the charts.
How much was itTag is labeled 2.5 inch cannonball. It's seemed pretty heavy for its size. Any ideas to it's authenticity? Any info would be appreciated. Thanks.
View attachment 2255759View attachment 2255761View attachment 2255762View attachment 2255760
Here's another resource for IDing if it's a solid shot.$120
I find that strange as well. I thought the vent hole and pour hole are usually 90 degrees from each other.There used to be a Gent known as the CannonBallGuy on TNET that was an authority. If he was here he could weigh in (no pun intended) on this. Sad not to see any of his posts.
What I find strange is there appears to be two distinct marks other than the seam. One appears to be the Sprue or pour point. The other appears at the opposite end of the Sprue and looks like it was smoothed over with either a file or grinder.
Thanks everyone for your input!There was a 3lb solid shot that size used in the Rev War that would have casting marks like the one you posted, the crudeness of it makes me think there's a very good chance its a Rev War ball and not a mill ball. There is such a thing as a 2.5" mill ball that would show similar cast marks but they're cleaner, more of a modern cast so to stay. Pretty confident its Rev War and whats $120 these days, a tank of gas.