Also, that was a typo on my behalf, was supposed to have read "might've been everywhere" implying that they are no longer everywhere. Either way, go pick a random field in New England and I'll pick one in Idaho, Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Washington or Montana and see who hits Spanish silver first.
You're seriously gonna look me in the eye and tell me that I have better odds of hitting Spanish silver in Idaho than I would in NJ or NY? You're right. I certainly would have the advantage when it comes to finding undisturbed ground. I can show you thousands of square miles out this way that's undisturbed. That doesn't mean jack though because no one ever set foot on it long enough to lose things. In order to consistently find coins and relics you need one of two things.
1. A location visited frequently by some.
or
2. A location visited once by many.
Just because we have lots of undisturbed "strata" doesn't mean coins are just laying around on top of it everywhere. Idaho was VERY sparsely populated and still is. In order to find coins, you have to have people to lose them. Dense population=Dense circulation. Gah! I feel like I'm taking crazy pills!
Can we have a beer now Erik in NJ? You make my brain hurtAll great things to consider. I have gained some knowledge from this dispute and I hope others can say the same
cheers man. and happy hunting to you. Thanks for watching. Lets go find some MORE!