newnan man
Gold Member
- Joined
- Aug 8, 2005
- Messages
- 6,753
- Reaction score
- 26,145
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Beautiful Florida
- Primary Interest:
- Relic Hunting
Upvote
0
I know chase. We are both moderators on another forum. I'm pretty sure he hasn't seen your reply or he would reply. However, just want to say chase did not make the claims you think he meant. Honestly, not wanting to start anything with you or anyone else, but I did not read his comments the way you did at all. I really don't know why you think this, but believe me, it's a mistake on your part. chase is not leveling any accusations at you.
Charlie Thank you!!I know chase. We are both moderators on another forum. I'm pretty sure he hasn't seen your reply or he would reply. However, just want to say chase did not make the claims you think he meant. Honestly, not wanting to start anything with you or anyone else, but I did not read his comments the way you did at all. I really don't know why you think this, but believe me, it's a mistake on your part. chase is not leveling any accusations at you.
Jon, reading chase's comment again, it is absolutely clear to me that he was talking about the comments AND THE IMPLICATIONS AND FALSE ASSOCIATIONS made in the article, and probably the other article as well, which wasn't posted on TNet but which also connects ah.com members with illegalities for no justifiable reasons, and not your short comment at all. He absolutely did not imply what you think he implied, Jon. Not at all......
chase wrote: "The fact that we have little regard for what that past holds. we do this for greed or for drugs! I find that as a racist remark, against artifact collectors."
The above statement is where you went wrong, Jon. Yes, chase did misuse the term "racism"; it isn't really racism, but a form of discrimination against collectors. And it's an untrue association and accusation for 99.999% of us! However, he isn't talking about your comment at all; he's talking about the 2 articles recently penned which connect collectors with illicit drugs and illicit digging. You took the statement personal when in fact the statement had nothing to do with you at all. You never said we do this for drugs, the articles did!