Wait, did you just, in the same post, both say that I'm the only one attacking anyone and (aside from insulting me multiple times) brag that your prior insults were directed toward me? Please explain the difference between insult and attack. And your first post--an insult by anyone's standards-- in this thread was not an "attack"? Would you rather that my post condemning black market transactions were not judgmental, but favorable? And your first post in this thread was directed at me, before I ever posted here? Please tell me you know that the principle that a person who cannot be trusted with little cannot be trusted with much was spoken by Jesus himself. Please explain in what manner my character is deficient by virtue of any of my posts. If I were a man of higher character, would I only post positive things? In fact, you and others who've been critical have never interacted, so far as I can recall, in any way with any of my positive posts. Your third point is conclusory: you haven't used any of my own words to support your conclusions. It was quite clear that your allusion to grapes was directed toward me. And no, I never post hoping to be misunderstood or to be perceived as something I'm not.
As to the other thread, yes, I called a man childish for risking $40,000 in taxes and penalties to hunt for some coins. It's what I'd tell my own brother.
You've shamelessly co-opted this thread by repeatedly insulting Dozer and me.
