Buffalo killer .50 caliber cartridges

toasted

Silver Member
Jun 1, 2015
3,437
14,081
Maryland
🥇 Banner finds
5
Detector(s) used
Minelab Equinox 600 XP Deus
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Found a few of these misfired rifle cartridges at an early spot on the river. Can anyone confirm that they date to just after the Civil War and were for Some type of trapdoor breechloader. They have the similar measurements to the various rounds that they fired. Total length 2 3/8”. Case length 1 5/8. Bullet .5 “ diameter
 

Attachments

  • 03B39749-F08B-4887-80C1-0B3300E2AD79.jpeg
    03B39749-F08B-4887-80C1-0B3300E2AD79.jpeg
    705.1 KB · Views: 55
Last edited:
OP
OP
toasted

toasted

Silver Member
Jun 1, 2015
3,437
14,081
Maryland
🥇 Banner finds
5
Detector(s) used
Minelab Equinox 600 XP Deus
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
There is no stamp
 

Upvote 0
OP
OP
toasted

toasted

Silver Member
Jun 1, 2015
3,437
14,081
Maryland
🥇 Banner finds
5
Detector(s) used
Minelab Equinox 600 XP Deus
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Could be .50-70?

Yeah I think so. Looks like when the US government adopted the 1873 Springfield and its .45 caliber round, they then sold of most of the guns chambered in .50 which often ended up in the hands of buffalo hunters like Buffalo Bill Cody
 

Upvote 0

TheCannonballGuy

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2006
6,543
13,072
Occupied CSA (Richmond VA)
Detector(s) used
White's 6000, Nautilus DMC-1, Minelab
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Because your .50-70 brass casing does not have a steel base-disc, and it does have a small-ish central primer-cap, it's not one of the "early US Military .50-70 cartridges" shown here:
https://www.oldammo.com/november06.htm

The version of external primer-cap in yours was patented in 1872, so they can't be from any earlier than that. Because your .50-70 casings do not have a headstamp, AND the bullet seems to have a small flat nose-tip, I'm guessing it is the version shown in the 2nd photo here, 1st (and cutaway 2nd) on the left of the row.
> https://www.oldammo.com/december06.htm

Several of the casings in the photos have a brass base-rim which is beveled at the underside edge of the rim. I can't tell from your single photo whether or not yours have the beveled-rim bottom. So, you'll have to closely examine yours in real-life and figure out which (if any) of the ones in the photos matches exactly with yours.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

ANTIQUARIAN

Gold Member
Apr 24, 2010
12,844
27,387
Upper Canada 🇨🇦
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, Lesche Piranha 35 Shovel & 'Garrett Carrot'
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Because your .50-70 brass casing does not have a steel base-disc, and it does have a small-ish central primer-cap, it's not one of the "early US Military .50-70 cartridges" shown here:
https://www.oldammo.com/november06.htm

The version of external primer-cap in yours was patented in 1872, so they can't be from any earlier than that. Because your .50-70 casings do not have a headstamp, AND the bullet seems to have a small flat nose-tip, I'm guessing it is the version shown in the 2nd photo here, 1st (and cutaway 2nd) on the left of the row.
> https://www.oldammo.com/december06.htm

Several of the casings in the photos have a brass base-rim which is beveled at the bottom edge of the rim. I can't tell from your single photo whether or not yours have the beveled-rim bottom. So, you'll have to closely examine yours in real-life and figure out which (if any) of the ones in the photos matches exactly with yours.


You never cease to amaze me with your knowledge of history my friend. :notworthy:
Dave

 

Upvote 0

pistol-pete

Hero Member
Nov 4, 2012
621
688
Custer County, CO. at 9300 Ft.
Detector(s) used
1970 Garrett Hunter, Garrett Ace 350, Garrett AT Gold, Garrett pinpointer
Primary Interest:
Metal Detecting
Cannonballguy is correct as always. Would like to add the the military didn't use brass cases until at least the 1880's or even 1890's. They were all copper until that time. Civilian ones were nearly always brass.
 

Last edited:
Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top