Can anyone date these buckles?

[CrazySlasher]

Thanks in advance!

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Upgraded Night Vision Monocular Digital Infrared Monocular Telescope for 100% Darkness with 8X Zoom - Grab it through Amazon!

[hammered]

Thanks in advance!

The first buckle looks early 20th century, maybe late 19th. But the second buckle, to me, looks like a broken half from the 1600's to 1700's. Try this link for the second buckle, No. 81 and 82, on the bottom row. Nice finds mate

http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ceejays_site/pages/bucklepage16.htm


hammered

 

[CrazySlasher]

Thank you. I thought the second broken buckle might be from the 1600-1700's, but I thought the first was older for some reason. I thought I had some photos of a similar buckle that was also 16-1700's.

 

[hammered]

Thank you. I thought the second broken buckle might be from the 1600-1700's, but I thought the first was older for some reason. I thought I had some photos of a similar buckle that was also 16-1700's.

I think the first buckle is just a cheap harness buckle, I could be wrong, but the early ones are normally copper alloy or bronze . If SS or Cru chip in they may confirm or not. The second one is a nice find though


hammered

 

[CrazySlasher]

Thank you. I thought the second broken buckle might be from the 1600-1700's, but I thought the first was older for some reason. I thought I had some photos of a similar buckle that was also 16-1700's.

I think the first buckle is just a cheap harness buckle, I could be wrong, but the early ones are normally copper alloy or bronze . If SS or Cru chip in they may confirm or not. The second one is a nice find though


hammered

You could be totally right, and probably are. I actually found that first buckle over a year ago and was just told about some finds that were made in that field including a cob. I also did pretty well there with early coppers, so I was just hoping. The second buckle (piece) was found today.

 

[hammered]

Thank you. I thought the second broken buckle might be from the 1600-1700's, but I thought the first was older for some reason. I thought I had some photos of a similar buckle that was also 16-1700's.

I think the first buckle is just a cheap harness buckle, I could be wrong, but the early ones are normally copper alloy or bronze . If SS or Cru chip in they may confirm or not. The second one is a nice find though


hammered

You could be totally right, and probably are. I actually found that first buckle over a year ago and was just told about some finds that were made in that field including a cob. I also did pretty well there with early coppers, so I was just hoping. The second buckle (piece) was found today.

Try this link, it has a lot of great info on Buckles through the ages http://www.ukdfd.co.uk/ceejays_site/pages/buckletitlepage.htm
Best of luck my friend and happy hunting, keep posting too, looks like you may have some great stuff in the ground there


hammered

 

[CrazySlasher]

Some more I could use help with.

 

[hammered]

Some more I could use help with.

The first one looks mid 1700's to early 1800's, the second, again, late 19th to early 20th. Nice range soil you have there, any musket balls yet?


hammered

 

[CrazySlasher]

Some more I could use help with.

The first one looks mid 1700's to early 1800's, the second, again, late 19th to early 20th. Nice range soil you have there, any musket balls yet?


hammered

Jars full. I end up giving them away now.

 

[Silver Searcher]

Thank you. I thought the second broken buckle might be from the 1600-1700's, but I thought the first was older for some reason. I thought I had some photos of a similar buckle that was also 16-1700's.

I think the first buckle is just a cheap harness buckle, I could be wrong, but the early ones are normally copper alloy or bronze . If SS or Cru chip in they may confirm or not. The second one is a nice find though


hammered

Nothing for me to do here ..all done

SS

 

[ANTIQUARIAN]

Some more I could use help with.

The buckle in the fourth picture looks similar to this one I found a few weeks ago.

Dave