🔎 UNIDENTIFIED Can anyone help on this backmark?

cahills9

Jr. Member
Apr 8, 2022
64
310

Attachments

  • 28A5B806-2D41-4186-BD91-E6EA5F29B734.jpeg
    28A5B806-2D41-4186-BD91-E6EA5F29B734.jpeg
    69.9 KB · Views: 85
  • 982FA723-860E-4C61-9C33-C8EA60FBD166.jpeg
    982FA723-860E-4C61-9C33-C8EA60FBD166.jpeg
    85.8 KB · Views: 49

TheCannonballGuy

Gold Member
Feb 24, 2006
6,542
13,069
Occupied CSA (Richmond VA)
Detector(s) used
White's 6000, Nautilus DMC-1, Minelab
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
IMO, Creskol got the country-of-manufacture (the "Lion Passant" in the backmark is a British hallmark) and the date-range exactly right.

Sidenote:
Technically, brass 1-piece flatbuttons with an indented-lettering backmark (like yours) can date as early as about 1810. But the war-of-1812 and postwar boycotting of British-made goods means it's very unlikely that your British-made button arrived in the US before 1820. Therefore, I agree with Creskol's 182030 dating of it.
 

Upvote 3

ANTIQUARIAN

Gold Member
Apr 24, 2010
12,841
27,385
Upper Canada 🇨🇦
🥇 Banner finds
1
🏆 Honorable Mentions:
3
Detector(s) used
XP Deus, Lesche Piranha 35 Shovel & 'Garrett Carrot'
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
I've always thought the back of these early 19thc buttons were often so much more decorative then the face. :thumbsup: I attributed this to the button maker 'advertising' to the public of their button-making talent. Also, the gold-gilt often remains because the back of the button didn't receive the same degree of wear to it as the face did.

Nice find,
Dave
 

Last edited:
Upvote 1

pepperj

Gold Member
Feb 3, 2009
37,402
138,641
🥇 Banner finds
1
Detector(s) used
Deus, Deus 2, Minelab 3030, E-Trac,
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
IMO, Creskol got the country-of-manufacture (the "Lion Passant" in the backmark is a British hallmark) and the date-range exactly right.

Sidenote:
Technically, brass 1-piece flatbuttons with an indented-lettering backmark (like yours) can date as early as about 1810. But the war-of-1812 and postwar boycotting of British-made goods means it's very unlikely that your British-made button arrived in the US before 1820. Therefore, I agree with Creskol's 182030 dating of it.
That button has some great maker's marks. Very nice 👌

I often wonder about the length of time a piece of clothing lasted back then.
A good wear clothing might be decades.
Even coats/cloaks were costly, taken care of might be around for many years.
 

Upvote 0

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top