Don in SJ said:
romeo-1 said:
A great find but the more I look at it the more I think that the bust is as you mentioned, solder runoff. It's too small to be a bust from a coin and it's too big to be a hallmark...not to mention it is not stamped as a hallmark would be. Of course this does nothing to diminish the find! To be able to positively identify it to the original settler is outstanding and this one belongs on the banner!
Great find IP!! Romeo, I would still have IP lean towards it possibly being a bust of KGII, I cannot tell the size of it nor the weight, but maybe it is from a KGII silver penny! The bust location would be approximately correct.
http://www.coins.nd.edu/ColCoin/ColCoinText/Br-Silver.1.html
IP should be able to compare and evaluate if that size cufflink could have been a silver penny, minus the applied shank.
Don
Don, If it were a coin it would be a very small one, but there are some old foreign silver that are tiny by our standards. That penny looks like it could be close! (in size anyway)
Romeo, I'll probably never really know and it doesn't make a whole lot of difference. The bust alone without other marks doesn't really sway things one way or the other because it could simply be a quality mark, or there for patriotic purposes. The same type of bust mark was also used to counterstamp George III 8 reales to use as emergency coinage. I can't say one way or the other but there's definitely nothing about that says it couldn't be. Heck even the B can be in question to some point but it was the surname of the property owner. It's neat but I'm not over the moon, it did charge me up a bit though to want something good.