Nice finds for sure! Great job on the video too!
Wondering...I've gathered from others that have posted comments on the new HF Coils...DEPTH seems to be seriously affected when using the new HF Coil.
Slap on the STOCK 9" or 11" Coil, and you'd be hammering that Civil War Bullet down to at least 6" to 9" inches...bad soil and all.
Thanks for sharing!
First of all thanks for viewing and commenting on the video, my first attempt at a metal detecting informational video. I'm no Calabash Digger from a personality and production values perspective, but I am just glad I did not come off as a blubbering idiot, either.
Sir, I understand based on theory where you are coming from, but I have to respectfully disagree on a couple of points. First of all, mineralized dirt aside, my experience (and I know Calabash Digger's experience) is that the HF coil is plenty deep on high conductors (e.g., clad and silver) at its lower frequency of 13 to 14 khz. Perhaps, not as ultimately deep as the LF coils at 4 khz, but I never use that frequency for various reasons (especially in hot dirt as explained below). The HF coils actually hit mid-conductors (gold, brass, small lead, aluminum) deeper than the LF coils at the higher operating frequencies. The HF 9" round coil is my general purpose coil now based on extensive runs at the beach, parks, and now hot dirt relic hunting. I have rarely gone back to the LF coils and am considering selling the 9" LF (and keeping the 11" LF for coverage).
Regarding the red mineralized dirt: Based on my experience of over 8 different multi-day CW relic hunts in the Culpeper region over the past two+ years using the Deus (including 4 different coils: 9/11" LF Round/Elliptical HF and 6 of those hunts were conducted without the HF coil in existance) and other detectors (such as the Whites MXT/MX Sport, Teknetics T2, Fisher F75, and AT Pro), LF coils will hold there own but will not noticeably out-perform the HF coil on depth there. The HF 9" round coil is your best bet for all around performance there (and, yes, that is not saying much). This is due to the following: At 13 to 14 kHz (for the HF) there is practically no depth performance difference than the LF coil at 8 or 12 khz. The HF coil is more stable in the mineralized dirt and emi (the literally hundreds of GPX/ATX PI detectors that are in the hands of 95% of the other folks hunting and overhead, poorly shielded power lines). 4 khz LF is unusable in Culpeper, period, because TX power is locked at 3. The HF coil affords the option to significantly up frequency to 28 khz which hits harder on small brass and lead, especially when you are scanning over dirt tailings removed from a deep trash pit or hut. If you really wanted to seriously hunt these fields with the LF, the 11" would be your best bet from a swing coverage standpoint, but will not outperform the HF on depth, believe me, even tweaking tx power down to 1 didn't make much of difference for me. I like to hunt with my GPX detector and strap the Deus on to my daypack or web gear suspension harness and carry it along with me. Sometimes, I just take the elliptical and rod and just tuck it into my belt. I actually preferred using the XP MI6 pinpointer in the field even if I was not using the coil. I just had the backphones slung around my neck and when I needed to pinpoint, put the GPX and GPX headphones down and donned the XP headphones and pinpointed, worked great.
BTW, I did not show it in the video, but full tones is also basically unusable in that soil, just constantly chattery even worse than my GF example.
BTW - as Smokey says, all VLFs suffer there, but if I was forced to detect there with a VLF detector, it would be the Deus. Primarily because of the flexibility of going into those various program modes I demonstrated. The only reason I highlighted the Deus in the title is because this is the Deus forum, not a knock against the Deus.