I didn't think I was going to be attacked so quickly ...
There is no "attack" here. Fact, sources of said-fact, & md'ing are being discussed. If someone dissents on a subject, it doesn't mean they are "attacking".
....Anyway, the Ancient American magazine that I have was given to me by a friend ... None of the stories even hinted at religion ....
Nor did I question your source of having obtained the magazine. Nor did I question your motives. Once I saw the title of the magazine, I looked it up. And saw article topics for various back issues. And the direction the magazine goes in , is akin to the "america unearthed" silly TV show. I sleuthed deeper to see if any critical peer reviews had been done. And that's where I got the links I posted here. None of which questions your personal sincerity.
..... So, I don't know where Tom_in_CA is getting his facts from but I find the stories I read interesting.....
"interesting" no doubt yes. Just as documentaries about UFO's and bigfoot, etc... are interesting as well. Sure, they are so much fun to want to "shake up" conventional thought/wisdom I totally understand that. It's human nature to want to be on the cutting edge. I got my facts from: Whenever extraordinary claims are made, check to see if peer reviews have already shot them down with equally compelling counter-evidence that answers with "more plausible explanations"
... Just wanted everyone to know that, no one ever lies, misleads, or misinforms on the internet...
Huh ? Well I'm sure that those that put forth such material are quite sincere. Thus "aren't lying". And thus aren't "trying to mislead", etc.. They no doubt very-much believe their stuff. But that doesn't make it true. And there is indeed lots of material "on the internet" that isn't necessarily true. Cross check for alternate explanations from experts in the fields.
...... The original document is found in the National Historical Archives of Spain....
Regarding the "faded clippings" that accompany such stories: When readers see such things, in their minds, it becomes iron-clad. But so too was the psychology present in all the fanciful lost mine, stolen stagecoach loot, missing military payroll , etc.. stories of the old treasure magazines of the 1960s & 70s. There'd always be a "faded newspaper clipping" . Such that now you establish a "name" or a "date" or a "location", etc... And the story is spun off of that. The insinuation being: The moment someone can put up a period article (ledger page, newspaper clipping, faded photograph, etc...) then presto: All the info contained from then on, must therefore be true. Eh ?
So to illustrate this: A buddy of mine submitted one of those articles back in the mid 1970s (in order to get the $50 article accept pay). The story was all fanciful and made up. But sure, it had a drawing of a miner posed next to his burro. And a faded newspaper clipping (for the starting dates and a chosen name for his story). But the rest was entirely made up. We got a good laugh wondering if anyone really went out looking for it.