Great thread… I was tempted to reply last week but held off in order to gather more data/ log more hours on this new machine.
I am in a love-hate relationship with my EQ 800. I love the light weight, big bright screen and wireless headphones. I love not having to use my Pro-Swing harness to save my arm. The problem stems from buying into all the hype and believing I was going to be digging lots of silver and deep ( missed ) oldies out of the hammered parks. So far, I have not found anything new in areas I’ve already gone over with my Explorer II. My expectations were very high due to the hype. I should have known ML would not market a new detector that would obsolete their cash cow CTX!
That being said, it is a great, modern detector. Minelab users spoiled by accurate target ID will be disappointed in the compact conductive numbers range resulting in lots of dug crown and screw caps.
The good:
Lightweight; big, bright screen; ease of use; wireless; fast recovery speed; tones; decent pinpointing
Note on depth: I find this has good depth ( dug a wheat at 7 inches measured and silver Rosie at 7 not including turf ). Maybe it goes deeper and perhaps I haven’t gotten the coil over a deep silver quarter/half but I haven’t found any silver dimes, wheats, etc. in the depths of 10-12 that others are reporting.
The bad:
Balance ( nose heavy as others have indicated ); cam locks loosening up; compact target ID without ferrous; likes crown caps and screw caps
The ugly:
ALERT! A piece of the plastic housing fell off my ML wireless headphones. I did not drop them…this just happened during normal use about the third or fourth time out. The plastic broke where the screws attach ( see pic ).
The images show the results of 3 separate hunts. I took these with the intention of showing potential buyers what they could expect. Granted, I still have lots to learn. Owners will no doubt have improved results over time as is the case with all machines.
As of now, I would grade it B+ overall.





