My theory is if you don't work you don't eat.
Let's test your theory, say I got in a car accident and ended up paralyzed. Then what? Starve?
Here is some food for thought...in 1970, working for minimum wage, one only needed to work about 75 hours to pay the average cost of renting a 1-bedroom apartment.
Today, one needs to work nearly 150 hours to accomplish the same thing.
In the time frame of the minimum wage from 1970 to 2015, rent has doubled in price, adjusted for inflation.
So logically speaking, if someone worked 40 hours per week and took home roughly $1000/mo, after taxes, and spent $700 on rent..
...how are they going to afford food, electric, car insurance, etc on the remaining $300 they have left?
It's ironic people even make an argument for food stamps, considering we spend only $75 billion per year on that...
..vs nearly $700 BILLION per year on the military industrial complex.
China has nearly 5 times as many people as we do, and yet they spend less than half that.
So if you want to go for the biggest squander of money in the budget, food stamps is no longer a valid thought.
Read some of the expense reports..$640...for a TOILET SEAT. $436 FOR A HAMMER. Over $4,000 for a COFFEE MAKER. Screws...$37 EACH!!
..oh..and don't forget the $400 BILLION DOLLAR fighter jet that could not fly at night..or during clouds..
The biggest whiners of food stamps, where I live, are farmers, yet they can't put 2 and 2 together and realize these people are buying the FOOD THEY GROW! DUH!