Yellow Hammer
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2008
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 8
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Anaheim Ca and Quartzsite Az
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab SD2200v2/GP4500
- #1
Thread Owner
. what you just saw was pretty much 19th century mining wich if it wasnt for the initial large surface deposits in the west would have turned away alot more old timers then it already did.ther methods were crude and most of their time their recovery sucked.if you have a spot that puts out pickers like that and your spending time building a sluice and not diggin your not finding as much gold as you could be... and i promise you shoveling into a fast running short wood sluice that is not made to catch fine gold like the one this guy made means your basically getting alot of gold wet and into the river. a keene a52 is packable and would recover those pickers plus fines and weighs about the same as that saw and shingle cutter. and the time spent building could be spent diggin. think of this guys for the first time last week my partner and i ran two sluices in a row i always come home with gold from one box classify find pickers lots of fines lead al the normal stuff we all do and talk about we just had an extra sluice and decided to put them one feeding the other.........guess what there was gold in the second box only a little but... we also put less material through then we have into just one box before we rcovered about a pennyweight in two hours.....but there was gold in the second box.........i need like a twenty foot sluice now