Guess who's back!

[Indiana_acklac]

A lot of what I have seems to match up with legit images, for what it's worth. Not etsy, not pintrest, like legit images.

And I mean absolutely no disrespect: But I've matched that Knife Blade up 100%?

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[smokeythecat]

You have a group of natural rocks, plus a fossil and a piece of modern sewer pipe. Keep looking. Look for materials that look different than those.

 

[AlabamaRelic]

You have a group of natural rocks, plus a fossil and a piece of modern sewer pipe. Keep looking. Look for materials that look different than those.

Your stove needs to be cleaned..

 

[Indiana_acklac]

So, honest to god guys, I'm trying to to be disrespectful.

But, take this example:

https://www.alamy.com/flints-prime-...eleen-sittard-stadswegske-image344560709.html

And my example:

They look kind of similar, no?

 

[Indiana_acklac]

I can find identical points in my bookmarks...

 

[Indiana_acklac]

Just give me a break? I've done hours upon hours of research?

I mean, am I wrong here? I don't know? I'm new at this?

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

None of your finds posted are artifacts. Why would you think the one with penny is a point other that it has a point?

 

[uniface]

The Alarmy items you've posted (takes too long to wait for oversized pictures to download & then play with image sizer) are unmistakably artifacts. In European archaeological terminology, they are "points." (That is, they taper to points in outline -- a category which has nothing to do with whether or not they were hafted.

The Alarmy examples are awls or borers.

Yours are similar in form, but seem to bde made of very poor materials, making them dubious as artifracts.

FWIW

 

[Indiana_acklac]

The Alarmy items you've posted (takes too long to wait for oversized pictures to download & then play with image sizer) are unmistakably artifacts. In European archaeological terminology, they are "points." (That is, they taper to points in outline -- a category which has nothing to do with whether or not they were hafted.

The Alarmy examples are awls or borers.

Yours are similar in form, but seem to bde made of very poor materials, making them dubious as artifracts.

FWIW

http://www.paleoanthro.org/static/journal/content/PA20090003.pdf

 

[Indiana_acklac]

https://www.researchgate.net/figure...di-Locality-1-Upper-Jonk-Basin_fig3_281203569

 

[Indiana_acklac]

The Alarmy items you've posted (takes too long to wait for oversized pictures to download & then play with image sizer) are unmistakably artifacts. In European archaeological terminology, they are "points." (That is, they taper to points in outline -- a category which has nothing to do with whether or not they were hafted.

The Alarmy examples are awls or borers.

Yours are similar in form, but seem to bde made of very poor materials, making them dubious as artifracts.

FWIW

Thanks, by the way, for your (now-edited) comments before you caved to the "oh this guys a newb screw him he doesn't know what he's talking about" crowd...

 

[Indiana_acklac]

http://www.paleoanthro.org/static/journal/content/PA20090003.pdf:

 

[Indiana_acklac]

.......

 

[Indiana_acklac]

.....

 

[Indiana_acklac]

......

 

[Indiana_acklac]

...........

 

[Indiana_acklac]

...............

 

[Indiana_acklac]

.....................

 

[Indiana_acklac]

........................

 

[Indiana_acklac]

............