Re: I can't find the reference, but wasn't someone going to...
BB the problem with your equation is that you lack knowledge of the simple basics of physics,
whilst you may be good at maths your not a genius, good maybe, but definitely not a genius,
you asked how light accelerated to the speed it travels at,
then afterwards saying it must be sound that converted once it reached a certain speed,, if you knew anything about physics you would have already known this instead of having to ask the question,
that and the rest of my post is basic knowledge to even a first year student,
the photons that make up light are born in the nucleus of an atomic particle surrounded by what is called the electron shell and this distance is infinitesimally small, so small it cannot be measured so is classed as zero distance, when it exits through the electron shell it is already travelling at the speed of light, it does not accelerate, it is born at the speed of light,
it is not sound that changes into light, light has nothing to do with sound even at the sub atomic level,
so your expression S/L cannot work,
the speed of light is determined by the photon itself, nor does it have other sub particles attached to it as you state, it is a sub atomic particle in its own right, it is the lightest sub atomic particle known and has almost no mass,
it can be thought of as a capacitor and holds an electrical potential, and it is that potential that determines how fast light travels, if that potential could be reduced by 10% light would travel 50,000 times faster,
and before you ask BB the math was done by someone a lot cleverer than you and published in 1972, by a theoretical mathematician who worked at an atomic energy physics laboratory in the US, although i can't remember which one there are quite a few, i remember reading it at that time as it was part of his work on FTL travel,
sound was mentioned last year when you posted that you had solved Einsteins wave theory,
how it was generated and the fact it could not travel in a vacum was patiently explained to you by more than one person over a number of posts, what part of that didn't you understand,
sound is not a moving wave of particles travelling outwards, it is generated by molecules vibrating and bumping into
each other when moved by a diaphragm, sound is the result of the molecules as each bumps into the one next to it before stopping and then the next one bumps and stops until the sound we hear is the last bump when it hits our ear drum, it is an effect not a cause, and sound cannot travel in a vacum as was explained to you,
in the atmosphere it travels at about 650 mph, it can travel faster than that through a denser material because the atoms making up that material are closer together, it does so under water, and even faster through a solid, but not in a vacum, molecules in space are to far apart to bump into each other and make what is called sound, it's estimated that there is approximately 1 atom per square kilometre in outer space,
so your S cannot work,
that is why you can see a lightning flash and have to wait for the thunderclap to follow a few seconds later, (diffrent speeds) light and sound cannot travel at the same speed nor form any type of cohesive bond to make a wave,
harmonics are a result of the change in pitch at the edge of a note or sound and are classed as even or odd order and are a multiple of the frequency of the note we hear, harmonics are what our ears use to identify which type of instrument is playing the note,
normal sound for an adult with perfect hearing is 20 to 20,000 cycles with the odd few people being able to hear up to about 23,000 cycles ( and we can detect the 2nd to 7th harmonics's) most cannot hear below or above that frequency, but sound can go much higher and can be heard by animals and effect what we hear in various ways due to interaction at those higher or lower levels, in music odd order harmonics are heard as distortion and canceled out in an amplifier by using feedback in varying amounts,
white noise is nothing more than electrical sound generated in a circuit when electrons ( the electrical energy) traveling through the circuit reacting with the material making up the diffrent components in the circuit and mixing like soup, diffrent components making diffrent electrical noise, a carbon resistor makes a diffrent noise to a copper resistor, because it has a higher magnetic inductance,
and the noise is amplified by a radio or amplifier through a speaker,
without amplification white noise cannot be heard, its a name given to what used to be called mush in the early days of radio before accurate measurements were able to be taken of equipment and the noise filtered out, it's also the background noise from the entire universe which is at a lower level, made up of the outpouring of magnetic and electrical energy from the stars,
also inverse and opposite, inverse means the same as opposite, it is just a diffrent words to describe it, so you cannot have an inverse opposite, it cancels itself out,
you say, the same binary sequence, without saying what that binary sequence is, and putting the maths on here to go with it,
that means nothing until you put it here and explain why,
all binary wether it is code or anything else is just a way of expressing a string of numbers or letters in 0's and 1's, it can be used for any maths covering anything you can apply maths to which is pretty much everything in the universe, it's not some magic formula that you seem to have made it, it was invented by man and applied by man to the things you talk about, including the binary sequence you seem to think of as the holy grail,
the computer you are reading this on uses that same binary to process all the information you see on screen, and there are diffrent binary codes for diffrent things, so which one are you referring to,,
you wrote that Einstein says that S and L are the same thing and that is where he is wrong,
Einstein never said that,
his E = MC squared has nothing to do with S that's something you have bought into the Equation, and has nothing to do with Einsteins Equations,
but it is what you used last year when you were telling everyone that you had solved his wave theory, you stated they travelled together in space right up to the speed of light,
in fact there is nothing about sound in either of his Equations, neither his wave theory nor his theory of relativity, the expression S is only in your equation,
and nothing i have written above is anything higher than the most basic physics for a 1st year uni student, not at the higher level yet a great deal you did not know nor have you understood, this brings into doubt anything you write on this subject,
Hello Jose
i have also read quite a bit recently by a number of theorists and mathematicians that cast doubt on parts of Einsteins equations, there are many questions Einstein has not answered, and a great deal not proven,
many other theories that have been proven should not work if all of his theory of relativity is correct, but the discrepancies appear to be ignored by most of the mainstream establishment,
John
? S & L are effectively the same thing, just different variable frequencies, and with a wide spectrum of separation. Why not any of the other in between frequencies, or combinations ?
