IDing the perpetrator or Finding the body?

BudP

Jr. Member
Sep 19, 2005
91
2
OR
Detector(s) used
Minelab XT17000/Explorer XS/Exp SE Pro
ID'ing the perpetrator or Finding the body?

Anyone here fool with this kind of 'treasure' hunting? I was compelled to work the 'OJ' dilemma. I also spent some time with 'Jack the Ripper'. I got interesting answers on both.

I recently had a wake-up call, fooling with my pendulum. A young woman was abducted from a college about forty miles from my home. She has been missing for a couple years. The authorities, as we speak, are prosecuting some poor clown with almost zero evidence. My wife suggested, having seen me find things(inanimate objects) that I try to find the girls body.

I dug out a map of Oregon and proceeded to work it with my pendulum. Initially I did it without a straight-edge, working the corners and eye-balling the swing direction. The lines seemed to converge at Beaverton(near Portland). I called to my wife and told her to get her straight-edge and a sharp pencil and come into the room where I was. She has always been my helper.

She came to the table where I was sitting in readiness and asked what kind of 'goodies' we were after. I reminded her of her suggestion to find the girl. She looked at me as if at a stranger and said, (definitely paraphrasing) 'Have you lost your frigging mind? I was KIDDING!'

I sat there, aparently with a stupid look on my face. She explained to me, the idiot, what I was doing was NOT a good career move. She said, 'If you come anywhere near that girl' s body, you will NOT be a "Super-Dowser". You will immediately become the PRIME suspect'. She then convinced me (easily) that those Police-people do not believe in dowsing. They believe that anyone with real information is part of the problem......and crime. I put my pendulum back in my pocket and folded the map. We went out to dinner.

In the future I'm going to concentrate on crimes I could not have anything to do with. I almost scared myself. I can hear it now. 'Please state your name and.........'

Anyone else try this.....unsolved crime thing?

Bud
 

dowser 501

Full Member
Apr 26, 2006
140
2
Re: ID'ing the perpetrator or Finding the body?

I dowsed years ago for a missing child and I spent a lot of time looking in old cemetaries under the loose head stones, as I had dowsed the body in a cavity what appeared to be in a cavity under a concrete covering . The target gradually got fainter as it disintergrated and soon after it was discovered under a concrete culvert. I had got within a mile of the target, but lack of time and confidence in my newly found ability was my problem. PLus wrong type of cavity. Another time using DNA from photos I followed two kidnapped girls from the bottom of Australian Eastern states to Darwin thousands of miles north where they were spirited away by their father. It was a custody case, I was spot on. It is definitely posssible to locate bodies. I have since discovered that if you make a study of DNA and if it is a homicide, use a combination of a photo, plus DNA and blood as your target as blood would be the strongest dowsing target possible when close up. Max
 

OP
OP
B

BudP

Jr. Member
Sep 19, 2005
91
2
OR
Detector(s) used
Minelab XT17000/Explorer XS/Exp SE Pro
Re: ID'ing the perpetrator or Finding the body?

Hey Max,

I am very happy to see someone is as facinated by a mystery as I am. I am very apprehensive though about mentioning I am persuing/searching by dowsing. I do not deal well with ridicule.

Bud
 

dowser 501

Full Member
Apr 26, 2006
140
2
Re: ID'ing the perpetrator or Finding the body?

Neither am I. That is why we are both posting here where we are immune to do-gooders who specialise in tearing people down. Max
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top