Is Metal Detecting now mostly just for diehards?

Wayfarer

Jr. Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2005
Messages
64
Reaction score
18
Golden Thread
0
Location
Western Idaho
Detector(s) used
White's: V3i, MXT, XL Pro
(In the past: White's: VX3, DFX, XLT, 6000 Di Pro SL, Coinmaster 2DB --- Minelab CTX 3030, Equinox 800)
Primary Interest:
All Treasure Hunting
I am new to this forum and would like to introduce myself. I am 35 years old and have been detecting since I was 8 years old. I was an avid detectorist for about 5 years back in the late 70's-early 80's but just picked the hobby back up here the last year to introduce my son to MD'ing. Perhaps it's the over 20 years that I didn't detect, but it seems like finding good stuff has become a LOT harder.

Back in the late 70's, I used a White's 2db TR detector and found silver coins almost every time I went out, many times I'd come home with 10-15 silver coins after just a few hours of detecting a local park or school. One of my favorite places to hunt was my own elementary school, which dated to the 1920's, and which I hunted many times. I distinctly remember finding a coin every few minutes at most sites I hunted. I found hundreds of silver coins at between 1" and 4" (which is about all my detector could do) at local parks, schools, churches, all the usual places. A site was "hunted out" when I'd come home with less than $10 worth of coins...usually always I'd come home at least with my pockets buldging with clad coins and a few silver coins too.

Once I hit my teenage years in the early 80's I put down the detector totally for the next 20 years. Then this last year I bought a White's XLT so I could introduce my own son to a hobby I so fondly remember when I was his age. Logic told me it might be a little harder to find good stuff than it was for me 20-25 years ago, but I really wasn't prepared for how MUCH harder. I have hit all the usual types of places, schools, churches, parks, etc., again but have come away from them with less than $1 in clad coins even after a half-day of steady hunting. My technique is much better than when I was a child too: I slow way down, dig all the questionable targets (I never used to dig anything but an obvious strong coin signal), weak targets, head to the less obvious areas of the site, and tried all the tricks I've learned. I usually come home now with a pocketful of pull tabs and bottle caps frequently dug at over 6". My equipment is also much better than before. As confirmed by my clad coin finds, my test bed, and the one mercury dime I found this last year (my only silver coin in dozens of hours of searchintg this last year), my detector (and my operating ability) is fully capable of easily reaching coin-sized targets at 8"-10". I've taken many hours and carefully mastered the various settings on my XLT, which is a great detector, by the way.

So my question is: have almost all the easy to hunt locations been hunted to the point that a good find is now rare? and does this mean that the heyday of recreational MD'ing is now basically over? Just like the placer deposits of the 1800's were easy pickin's for the first miners, with nuggets literally laying all over the ground in places, and now it takes lots of hard work to find just a little fine gold, the early days of the metal detecting "gold rush" are forever gone with metal detecting now becoming a relatively low profit activity for just purists or specialists?

My second related question is: what can I do to make detectoring fun and interesting for my son?

The obvious answer is that the modern detectorists must research more to find the virgin hunting grounds. Sounds more like gold mining to me: "You just have to look harder for the places and gold the others have missed." Yes, agreed no location will ever be totally hunted out, just like no placer stream will ever be totally cleaned out of gold. But eventually doesn't it get so difficult to find anything of value anymore that it just isn't fun or worth the time anymore? No, I'm not talking about MD'ing being profitable, just finding enough good stuff to make it fun and keep someone's interest. My son is losing interest because 99% of what we find is pure junk.

Perhaps the only sites that are worth hunting anymore are on private property and so may not have been hunted before, which brings me to another point: I find private property owners to be generally hostile towards detectorists. 25 years ago, I was almost always cheerfully granted permission by a home owner to search their yard, now I am usually denied permission and the ones that do give me permission say that others have already asked permission and have hunted the property already (in which cases my finds are a little better than the local park). In some of the old neighborhoods in Dallas where I now live, homeowners have told me that every couple of years a detectorist goes door-to-door in the neighborhood seeking permission to hunt, so it looks like other detectorists have already "turned over" virtually all the "stones" in search of virgin territory.

Over the last 10 years or so, MD publications have been advising how to hunt "hunted out" areas: go slow, dig the iffy signals, go deep, do more research, etc.. These strategies may have kept the hobby alive for another 10-15 years but even those strategies don't work very well now that they've been employed by many people for some time. I've tried hard to get back into the hobby but after I spend a whole day of my precious free time to find $0.40 of corroded clad coins and a hundred pull tabs, scraps of foil, bottlecaps, and unidentifiable rusty peices of scrap metal, I just don't want to go out and do it all over again. Maybe I just need a fresh way to look at metal detecting, a new philosophy, that doesn't depend on actually finding much cool stuff to keep my and my son's interest. The metal detecting catalogs all still try to sell the idea that you will go out and find all kinds of valuable things, even when we know such finds are now becoming VERY hard to come by. Is this creating unrealistic expectations and setting up new detectorists for a big dissappointment?

I still think metal detecting is a great hobby, a great way to get outdoors, get a little exercise, learn about history, meet interesting people, see hidden and remote historical sites, and just satisfy my need to dig through the dirt. So perhaps I and others will soldier on as a diehards undeterred by the difficulty of making good finds. At least I can be thankful that I participated in the "glory days" of metal detecting and have wonderful rosy memories. :)
 

Upvote 0
I think that you are right, for the most part, about public areas especially. Many parks and such have probably been hunted so many times that it is very difficult to find any old coins any more, not to say that there aren't any there, just that the ones that are there are probably deeper and in more inconspicuous areas. However, I do believe that there are millions of private properties that have never seen the likes of a detector, finding them is just the hard part. Like you said, it requires a lot of research to find the right areas now.

Now with that being said, I believe that there are still many "virgin" places across the USA. I live in WV, and here I don't ever remember seeing anyone with a detector, even on public land, except for one time this year when I went to detect at a local beach on a lake here, there were like 5 detectorists there, but I belive that they all came together, and they all had Ohio tags on their cars. The only other person that I remember having a detector was my uncle, he had a White's Coinmaster in the early 80's, and the hobby never did stick with him. I know that there has to be hundreds or thousands of good places to detect here, I just have to find them now.....too bad everyone can't live in a "detectorless" place like myself.

HH
 

Actually my view is that most of the young detectorists today do not think of themselves as "diehards". Today's detecting environment is just the one they have grown up with. The folks with the problem are the "oldtimers" such as myself who "remember when". If you think hunting parks? is difficult now because of your late 70's experience try my coin shooting era of the early 60's. Hunting virgin parks, schools, and old churches was the order of the day. Detecting a park where someone else had detected was unthinkable(actually rare at the time). Finding 30 to 50 silver coins per day and accumulating a quart jar 3/4 full of IH pennies was what a lot of early detectorists? besides me were doing.

Today being an "oldtimer" ,I can not follow the same path I did in the 60's and 70's of regular park or school hunting.? I have forgotten the last time I hunted a park or schoolyard- What 15 years? Today I do mainly gold hunting with occasional forays into old? mining camps looking for coins and relics.? Most of my hunting is on public land. It is just hard for me to do regular coinshooting today considering the past.

I did not know it was that tough for todays coinshooters but I guess things have changed after 50 years of detecting in this country.

George
 

Yes,Wayfarer,I remember with nostalgia detecting in the 1960's.I would quit when my pocket bulged with silver.And no coins found over 4" deep! Thankfully we have much better detectors now.In those days I never found an indian cent,no Barber dimes,no V nickles,no Barber half,no Standing Lib.halfs,no relics.When I came back to this game 4-5 years ago I got discouraged pretty quickly.But I really strained my brain to remember the places I'd seen during the non-detecting years that might be worth trying.I got out maps and history books,etc.Now I'm finding coins and relics that I never dreamed of finding in the "good old days".To tell the truth,a good day for me now is finding one coin over 100 years old.But that one coin does satisfy me as well as a pocket full of silver did 35 years ago.Last week I got out before the ground froze and found an 1891 nickle in nice shape.Made my day!
 

Wayfarer, I can understand your frustration. For me fortunately I live in an area where a 15 to 20 minute drive puts me into areas that had plenty of people 70/80 years ago. I see posts of people here that are trying to figure where to go hunt as they can drive 30/40 minutes and still not leave the city limits. Have you tried checking out local clubs? They can be not only enrertaining but also have numerous outings where they have permission to hunt old area as well as having a wealth of info for your area. You might check out this club as it's probably not too far from you. HH
http://www.lonestartreasure.com/index.shtml
 

I agree its harder now than ever to find good stuff!!! I think that technology has played a large part in finding less as time goes by. Most coins that were shallow and easy to find have been found by now. So we buy deeper and better machines that still make finds but not nearly as many. Better research and getting lucky to find a virgin site will pay off. Good luck to all in your adventures and may your pockets be filled with treasure!!!!!
HH
Greg
 

This is a good thread, I've only been at this for about 5 years or so. I am between 250-300 coins from before 1900. The coins are still out there! They lay deep and are easy to find if you hunt the right sites.
 

Wayfarer,

Location is a big one. I lived in West Texas and moved to Dallas several years ago....(In montana now and freezing my jingle bells off)...

I remember sitting at a park in Dallas one Saturday afternoon....There were four separate MDers that day.

I think now days it means more driving....but dead or mostly dead? No I don't think so at all....

I feel it just comes to location and going out a little further.

Clayprinter
www.clayprinter.com
 

Wayfarer,
First of all, welcome to the forum!
If you have been reading any of these threads you can see that there are still many things to be found. Many of them are quite impressive. I too started detecting in the "golden years" for this area, back in the early 70's, and yes, pickings were much more plentiful then. I think that there are still virgin areas to detect, but you will need to do your homework. I know that in my area there are picnic groves that haven't seen any activity (except maybe some grazing cattle) for more than 80 years, including detectorists.
I don't get too excited anymore about going to the local park or schoolyard just because you can spend an entire day and not find anything old.
Construction projects, where dirt has been moved around, in older parts of towns have been keeping me going for the last several years, but even finding these can be difficult to find unless you do the research.
Good luck! If you don't think there are anymore good finds to be made, keep checking "Todays Finds" section on the forum.
 

Wayfarer said:
So my question is:? have almost all the easy to hunt locations been hunted to the point that a good find is now rare?? and does this mean that the heyday of recreational MD'ing is now basically over??

My second related question is:? what can I do to make detectoring fun and interesting for my son?

I find private property owners to be generally hostile towards detectorists.?

Hi and welcome!
WOW! Your post covers a lot of ground.

You ask: have almost all the easy to hunt locations been hunted to the point that a good find is now rare? and does this mean that the heyday of recreational MD'ing is now basically over?

By easy areas I assume you mean city parks, school grounds, etc. The answer is yes, most have been hunted many times and the bulk of old finds are gone.

If you think THing was great in the 70's, you should have tried it in the 60's! I'd average 30 coins an hour (1 every 2 minutes). Most were pennies but I also found lots of silver.

What's left is mostly deep or on edge. These coins got deep because they were stepped on or driven over in muddy weather. Some were covered over by landfill. In the 60's one could find Barber and even Seated coins less than 3 inches deep. My hot depth was 2 3/4 inches. The TR machines were perfect for them. In fact, if undisturbed, most big finds are still less than 5 inches deep.

Today hunting the easy sites you're looking at hunting very slowly with a deep seeking VLF that's able to work around iron and pinpoint almost perfectly. Depth is important in hard-hunted areas but also use a smaller coil to separate the coins from junk.


You wrote: what can I do to make detecting fun and interesting for my son?

Take him to action areas and make it a game of friendly competition. Kids are thrilled even with modern coins.

You wrote: I find private property owners to be generally hostile towards detectorists.

Right on! It's difficult to find places to hunt these days. It can be done but you probably will get 9 NO's to every yes.

This is where being creative comes into play. Take your detectors with you as you travel. Stop and chat with folks. Sometimes you'll find nice people who will say "sure, have a go at my yard." You have to work at this harder than we did back in the 60's. Back then few people even believed it was possible to detect treasure under ground. People would let you hunt just to see that doodad thing work.

The old days are gone but there's still good stuff out there. But I'm sorry to say; most of the silver is gone.
 

I started in the mid 70's with a BFO machine that was tons of work. No discrimination what so ever. Dig every signal. I think the oldest coin I ever found was an 1895 Liberty nickel, at about 6 inches. Rode my bike home SCREAMING that day.

I now have a White's MXT that I bought to replace my Tesoro Silver Sabre II. I have yet to find a silver coin, but after searching a few parks, I have pretty much given up on coin shooting, and moved on to relic hunting. See my post 'My first REAL finds'.

I guess what I'm trying to add to this thread is, things are still out there, but since people aren't spending silver coins anymore, they aren't being lost for us to find, either. There is still lots of stuff to find, though.

Try the local library, and find out where fairgrounds, church socials, or revivials were held. You might not find such places in downtown Dallas, but maybe out in the 'country'. You might check out the locations of any local 'ghosttowns', too.

But whatever you do, don't give up, and have a look at this forum as often as you can. These folks are finding some AMAZING coins and relics every day. It's out there.

Roger
 

i do it for the fun and enjoyment of it, never knowing what ur going to dig up next. there are times i think i spend to much of my free time, doing it, thats when i come home and the wife ask me who are you ,u live here?
 

Great post. Its harder for sure even 10 15 years ago some silver per day was pretty common, now a silver piece every 3 or 4 outings all day outings that is. When the older coins come great, but rings/jewerly keep me going. And keep hunting those same old spots and you will be amazed, when I think a place is "hunted out" up pops another silver or indian. It just blows my mind..
 

Here's my take on this from a newbies perspective. This year is my first in metal detecting, and I have only found 1 silver coin, a 1964 dime. Am I discouraged? Heck NO! Maybe the silver is much, much harder to find, but that makes it more special to me when I do find it. If silver were 2" down everywhere, it wouldn't be any more special than clad is today, right? This hobby of ours is called "Treasure Hunting", and nowhere is treasure easily found. If it were, we'd all be fat, rich and happy. I have found 1,001 coins this year, mostly clad, with some wheaties, my 1964 dime and an 1882 Indian Head mixed in. I have 2 gold and 4 sterling rings, a sterling necklace, some really neat relics, and a few dozen antique bottles, one of which is a scarce bottle and might fetch over $100. I enjoy hunting parks and schools, and the occasional out of the way spot that research tells me might be good. My friend and I have had moderate luck at locating old trash dumps, which is where the bottles mostly came from. I plan on doing a lot of research this winter to find more potential spots, and will make a strong effort this year to try construction sites like street/sidewalk tearups and excavations. We are also in the beginning stages of researching a potentially VERY valuable cache site 2 hours away from us that is appearing to have some real promise. It's out there, and I welcome the challenge in finding it!
 

You just keep at it TreasureKid and all you other people just starting out. You find a few here and a few there, then the next few years your numbers increase. As we get into this hobby we learn as we go and choose to hunt different sites too. Sometimes we upgrade machines and it helps. My first year i got 17 keepers, (mostly silver and 1 Ingian head), next year 34, The 3rd year i started hunting demo sites (yards), i got 65 keepers and the last of those was the Dahlonega coin. Then my wife figured i was serious about this hobby and approved a upgrade ( MXT). So the 4th year i hunted the demo and sidewalk replacements and ended up with 169 keepers (124 from before 1900). This year had a different work schuedule and only got 83. Sure there are not all the silver coins laying in the parks like there once where. But there are many sites that had never been detected. Those sites are ones of oppertunity and the ones that are the last people think to hunt.
 

I read an article in Thing mag that said we are loosing far more coins per year than are being found. The answer is find LOCATIONS that had ACTIVITY over TIME. Is this a hobby for hardcore detectorist? Maybe, because it takes a little more imagination, time, and research to find good productive locations. Other times we just literally walk up on them.

Ed Donovan
 

Creativity is the word. Think out of the box.

These statements are trite but true.

Everybody but everybody is looking for that ripped up sidewalk, old Victorian house, old park or school, etc.

Find out where big action areas were in the 16th ? early 20th century and look for vacant lots or farmer?s fields.

Check ebay. Sometimes large caches are auctioned there. Usually these are found in farmers fields. This is true everywhere--not just the U.K.

It's a whole lot easier to get permission to hunt a vacant spot than it is the grass around a 20 million dollar condo complex? ;)
 

I would look at two things. I assume your using the stock 9.5 coil. This is not the best for many site as as it suffers so much from target masking. Its often called the air test coil as thats where it works best. Try a switch to the 8 inch.
I'm also a little worried that you say you have got to grips with the XLT yet say you are now a better detectorist than in the past as you have learned to search slowly. If you had said carefully then fine, but slowly and a four filter machine like the XLT doesn't mix. Up the sweep speed and you will improve both depth and discrimination.
Programme wise I would suggest you experiment with Relic and accept down to at least minus twenty. No icons/notch and I would even say ignore the number I.D. readout. Concentrate on where the bars arrear on the Signagraph and how many block up together.
After you have set the tone to suit your hearing and tweaked up the Relic programme to suit your local conditions you will only need to adjust Recovery speed to achieve great performance on most land sites.
 

U.K. Brian

How did you come to the decision to go with a smaller coil. Here on the east coast of the US we hunt many fields and need to get a larger foot print to cover more ground. I see XLT,s in operation and they do not appear to mask objects. The only time I would think they would is near the roads and in locations where houses or buildings were tore down. Are you saying that masking is a problem with the 9.5 " coil with the XLT? Or that masking is a problem when relic hunting?

Ed Donovan
 

Granted silver coins are not as easy to come by as before and it is due to many factors including lack of places to hunt. Before you could ask for permission from a land owner and always get the go ahead. Now the owner is worried about being sued from you injureing your self on the property. Also some parks are off limits now to detectorists frm past damage or they are worried about losing artifacts that might be there. Makes no difference if they don't plan on doing a dig.

There are more detectorist out there now and silver being very conductive it is easy for even a old machine to find. More junk in the parks gives the masking effect and a small coil helps in these areas. Most hunters swing the coil like a grass whip and don't keep the coil low and even with the ground through the entire swing.

Using a large coil at a beach in the dry sand covers a large area per swing and this means more finds than your partner's eight inch coil. Forget the depth for now, just square inches. Digging deep holed in the sand or water uses time and this cuts down on finds too.

Research is part of the hobby too and it's not just about "profit." Just like deer hunting is not all about the shot, you have the hunt involved and the "lies" back with your partners.

HH,
Sandman
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom