In the Blog Article "King Arthur's Final Location" by Americans Noeller & Atwell, while acknowledging Alan Wilson & Baram Blackett (pen name of Andrew Terry) as the prime source of their information, they go off on a massive miasma melange of misinformation mixing characters and people from various time to fabricate evidence in a sordid ruse attempt prove the claim of King Arthur in America and being killed by Native Americans in Jackson county, Kentucky.
As with the English church wall painting of St Edmund, which there are several in British churches, they mislabel as showing this alleged murder, they misidentify Norse Rune stones as that fake Coelbren alphabet detailing Arthur and Welsh in America.
The legend of Prince Madoc's 12th century discovery of America that was promoted during the reign of Queen Elizabeth I as an attempt to claim all of North America for England is combined with the King Arthur legend, with Madoc becoming Arthur's brother, and Morgan La Fey, Arthur's half sister and mother of Mordred, are merged to become Arthur's nephew, son of Madoc.
For good measure, Taliesin, a 6th century itinerate poet/bard, author of the "Book Of Taliesin" becomes Merlin the Druid wizard and mentor to Arthur.
With all this mixing of misinformation and mislabeled pictures and photos the question that needs to be addressed:
To what purpose does promoting this obvious travesty of pseudo history of King Arthur in America serve?