tnsharpshooter
Bronze Member
- #181
Thread Owner
This HF2 coil behavior.
We in USA might have it luckier than some in other countries? Why..
Because our current currency coin wise that read moreso in gold ring range is the nickel. (Yes I realize some gold rings can read zincoln penny ID) but these are more rare likely in existent.
Wonder if we had a 3 cent coin that just just a tad smaller than a nickel and read little lower. And had a 10 cent coin that was tad bigger than a nickel and read a tad higher. If we had these coins in USA, high chance this system would even be more productive through its use. Meaning. Even possible more targets (reading in gold ring range) in the wild could be called rejects for gold rings metal detecting behavior.
Some other countries this what I talked about above, indeed may be the circumstance inside their countries looking for gold rings metal detecting. I am not talking about those ferrous component coins ether like Canada has.
PS
And if our as of late discontinued zincoln would have been made in 1982 of something different yielding lower ID closer to a nickel. Hmmm
Yeah if all the above would have taken place, this. This would have added to the Turn Off factor for gold rings metal detecting likely inside the USA!
Might have raised the junk target (defined as not a gold ring) by a large percent overall !
You know this could happen.
Someone may figure out a dime and perhaps even a quarter could be made cheaper using some other metals.
And it happens. And they read smack dab in gold ring range. Hmm
We in USA might have it luckier than some in other countries? Why..
Because our current currency coin wise that read moreso in gold ring range is the nickel. (Yes I realize some gold rings can read zincoln penny ID) but these are more rare likely in existent.
Wonder if we had a 3 cent coin that just just a tad smaller than a nickel and read little lower. And had a 10 cent coin that was tad bigger than a nickel and read a tad higher. If we had these coins in USA, high chance this system would even be more productive through its use. Meaning. Even possible more targets (reading in gold ring range) in the wild could be called rejects for gold rings metal detecting behavior.
Some other countries this what I talked about above, indeed may be the circumstance inside their countries looking for gold rings metal detecting. I am not talking about those ferrous component coins ether like Canada has.
PS
And if our as of late discontinued zincoln would have been made in 1982 of something different yielding lower ID closer to a nickel. Hmmm
Yeah if all the above would have taken place, this. This would have added to the Turn Off factor for gold rings metal detecting likely inside the USA!
Might have raised the junk target (defined as not a gold ring) by a large percent overall !
You know this could happen.
Someone may figure out a dime and perhaps even a quarter could be made cheaper using some other metals.
And it happens. And they read smack dab in gold ring range. Hmm
