Lost Confederate gold & Beale Code 1 - Solution.

legrand

Sr. Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
382
Reaction score
271
Golden Thread
0
121​
67​
95​
122​
216​
548​
96​
11​
201​
77​
364​
L​
O​
N​
G​
R​
A​
I​
L​
W​
A​
Y​

Long railway in 1820. Interesting. Keep going.
 

121​
67​
95​
122​
216​
548​
96​
11​
201​
77​
364​
L​
O​
N​
G​
R​
A​
I​
L​
W​
A​
Y​

Long railway in 1820. Interesting. Keep going.
Can you embellish on what you've written here?
We've presented our case; looking for communication on that subject.
All has been revealed in the website linked.

L.
 

Few comments on subject.
1. Many scientists revealed that both C1 and C3 encoded using the same key text. There is a number of papers about it, with nice graphs.
2. No railways existed in 1820 in US.
 

Absolutely. We could choose a railroad between animal pulled, 1 mile long and wooden one :-)
 

Seems rather risky to move the treasure past Union lines, especially by sea.
 

Almost a year in the finalizing, Beale C1 is solved; a jargon code, within a code.
Ron Gervais welcomes you to his site to view "Major Beale News"...
Our team of three introduces you to a Beale solution (there are several) - this is now public and no secret, enjoy:

https://www.angelfire.com/pro/bealeciphers/index.html

Legrand
You have spent years and years fixated on this same source and arriving at a forced solution, all the while never even realizing that all you have accomplished is the proving that the original narration in the Beale Papers is completely fiction with absolutely zero directly connecting evidences in support of your forced solution.
 

In my many years of having been involved with this tale of treasure, I have seen grammatically correct solutions that are 90% complete without any code replacing, claims of coder error, etc. And at least one of those solutions was consistent with the tale. Of the remaining 10% of these solutions, however, once code values are accepted as error and replaced we are then, "creating code rather than deciphering it."

It is unimaginable that a coder could produce two grammatically correct ciphers and then go completely mindless and sloppy when creating the one that matters most. And yet, this is what hopeful and desperate decoders eventually end up resorting to, and for good reason, just not the ones they desire to accept.
 

In my many years of having been involved with this tale of treasure, I have seen grammatically correct solutions that are 90% complete without any code replacing, claims of coder error, etc. And at least one of those solutions was consistent with the tale. Of the remaining 10% of these solutions, however, once code values are accepted as error and replaced we are then, "creating code rather than deciphering it."

It is unimaginable that a coder could produce two grammatically correct ciphers and then go completely mindless and sloppy when creating the one that matters most. And yet, this is what hopeful and desperate decoders eventually end up resorting to, and for good reason, just not the ones they desire to accept.
Good point, most missed c2 has misspelled letters in a specific order and place. But you have to find it old school.
 

Here's the basis for the December "Popular Mechanics" article.
Let's study the paper attached.
What do Louisbourg, Oak Island and Machias Seal Island have in common?
Why WOULD Semple have taken gold to MSI? Why cross that line?

L.
 

Attachments

Hi Team BOG (Bauman, Oxford, Gervais),

Could you please state which transcription you used for the code numbers in your Beale_C1.xls file

Because when compared to the sources on myoutbox and Wikisource (which are identical)
There are 4 differences.

Version differences found:
Index:--> Codes( :: Wikisource :: BOG_xls)
259 --> :: 324 :: 320
262 --> :: 64 :: 68
416 --> :: 39 :: 36
461 --> :: 868 :: 858
 

Last edited:
Hi Team BOG (Bauman, Oxford, Gervais),

Could you please state which transcription you used for the code numbers in your Beale_C1.xls file

Because when compared to the sources on myoutbox and Wikisource (which are identical)
There are 4 differences.

Version differences found:
Index:--> Codes( :: Wikisource :: BOG_xls)
259 --> :: 324 :: 320
262 --> :: 64 :: 68
416 --> :: 39 :: 36
461 --> :: 868 :: 858
Lestrada:
Looking into this. Conferring with G.
Are you soon online?
Your reply is brilliant and exudes an interest/enthusiasm for the codes. Nice.

B.
 

Ahh the Gervais connection!

 

Lestrada:
Looking into this. Conferring with G.
Are you soon online?
Your reply is brilliant and exudes an interest/enthusiasm for the codes. Nice.

B.
Les...
We used the one from Viemeister's book,
which was photocopied from an original Beale pamphlet.

B.
 

Hi legrande,
Viemeister should be a reliable source.
Thanks for taking the time to check.

At this site (wiebke-elzel) you can find a hi-res image of Friedmans' photocopy of the damaged original 1st Beale cipher (image 10/26).
Beale trail documents
 

Hi legrande,
Viemeister should be a reliable source.
Thanks for taking the time to check.

At this site (wiebke-elzel) you can find a hi-res image of Friedmans' photocopy of the damaged original 1st Beale cipher (image 10/26).
Beale trail documents
You're welcome.
Beale Code 1 was solved to lead to the Bay of Fundy.

B.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom