My personal opinion is that you're not taking in much learning from the comments that have been added to many of your posts.
There are a number of classes of meteorite that can be readily identified by visual appearance alone with a high degree of certainty but those are relatively few in number. Stony achondrites including those of Lunar or Martian origin most definitely do
not fall into that category. The simple reason for that is because they have a geological origin and mineralogy which is very similar to the conditions under which many Earth rocks were formed.
You referenced meteorite finds in Arfrica as having been identified "by eye", but what you have not understood is that these are almost always desert finds. From sandy deserts. In those kinds of areas which are usually relatively devoid of rocks, there is a very high probability that small, isolated, odd-looking stones laying in the sand will turn out to be meteorites. Sometimes they have fusion crusts which increases the probability further and also makes them stand out against the light-coloured sandy environment.
View attachment 2210105
Even then, it takes specialised testing to confirm them and they don't get entered into the MetSoc database without submission of such results from a competent laboratory with relevant expertise.
If your ICP test results are consistent with meteoritic origin and inconsistent with terrestrial origin then of course there is no justification for dismissing a claim that your rock is a meteorite. The only caution would be that it takes an expert in meteoritics to interpret the results, and laboratories able to undertake such tests typically do not have the expertise for interpretation... and neither do you.
I understand why you would want to continue to pursue that approach if you are able to get the tests performed for free, but I have suggested a number of times that a specialist laboratory (the best I know of is New England Meteoritical Services) will give you a definitive and indisputable answer, as well as a typology, from a 10g specimen at a cost of $30 (plus postage if outside the USA).
I'm sure you will continue to argue as before that you're unwilling to risk losing any of your specimen in the post because of your belief that you have something of extraordinary value. I will continue to say that's a poor argument, given that: the risk of loss is small in the overall scheme of things; 10g is only a tiny fraction of what you have (0.5% in this case); and that the value of a rock that is only suspected as a meteorite remains at zero without an expert assessment to confirm the suspicion.