My favorite find.

[runningbird671]

I found this beautiful Piece of History Along with most of the skeleton of a Equus Giganteus, "Largest horse on fossil record". I donated the Partial skeleton To the Grinnelle Iowa college. I, however, kept this piece along with several others for my collection. I believe that it is a Hand held maul That I find special Because of a

snake totem Carved into the reverse. I believe that it might be bone as well.
Hope you enjoy My Discoveries and any comments are great. I could be wrong on what it is So I welcome anyone's thoughts, thank you.

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

How to Research for Treasure Hunting and Metal Detecting From Lead Generation to Vetting - Grab it through Amazon!

[runningbird671]

I'm not really sure why the one stone has a cross on it, but it was found in the same Site as everything else. I would love to hear some opinions about that Because I have no idea.
Thanks everyone

 

Amazon Forum Fav 👍

Family Maps of Hinds County, Mississippi, Deluxe Edition - Grab it through Amazon!

[runningbird671]

I'm not really sure why the one stone has a cross on it, but it was found in the same Site as everything else. I would love to hear some opinions about that Because I have no idea.
Thanks everyone View attachment 2115949 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115951 View attachment 2115952 View attachment 2115954 View attachment 2115955 View attachment 2115956 View attachment 2115957 View attachment 2115953 View attachment 2115958 View attachment 2115959 View attachment 2115960 View attachment 2115961 View attachment 2115962

Some better pictures of the snake, I hope. Sorry everyone I try to do the best I can with photos. I hope that these photos are better quality.
Thanks You all for any input.
Everyone have a great day.

 

[runningbird671]

I'm not really sure why the one stone has a cross on it, but it was found in the same Site as everything else. I would love to hear some opinions about that Because I have no idea.
Thanks everyone View attachment 2115949 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115950 View attachment 2115951 View attachment 2115952 View attachment 2115954 View attachment 2115955 View attachment 2115956 View attachment 2115957 View attachment 2115953 View attachment 2115958 View attachment 2115959 View attachment 2115960 View attachment 2115961 View attachment 2115962

Forgot to put something for scale. The first little figure Is about 2 inches by 2 inches? The next 2 or bounce 8 inches by 6 inches As well as a snake

 

[ticndig]

the scrapes may be where a plow struck them.

 

[runningbird671]

the scrapes may be where a plow struck them

 

[runningbird671]

All of the objects were found
About 2 feet under the water And Sand in a large Creek With the fossil Bones that I found. Nowhere near a field. They have already been checked out and identified as worked Stone and not plow marks. I spent a whole summer in my chest Waitress in that Creek Digging all of it up. That was a great summer. My hands hurt something bad, but it was absolutely fun.

 

[ticndig]

. I spent a whole summer in my chest Waitress

lucky guy for sure. congratulations on your recovery.

 

[newnan man]

Those stones are not worked, just rocks. Who ever checked them out is mistaken. The fossils are great, not related to the stones in anyway.

 

[runningbird671]

Those stones are not worked, just rocks. Who ever checked them out is mistaken. The fossils are great, not related to the stones in anyway.

I respect And welcome everyone's Opinion, Whether they are. right or wrong. I can't assure you that
The archeologist that held them in his hand And examined them, made a correct Decision when Informing me that they are indeed worked stones. Going off of photographs I'm sure it is sometimes hard to make a correct Decision On the subject Of worked or not worked Stone.
Regardless I thank you for your opinion.
Have a great day And happy holidays. Turkey day is just around the corner.

 

[runningbird671]

Nice bones! Thanks for posting.

Thank you, have a great day And upcoming thanksgiving.

 

[Blackfoot58]

Thank you, have a great day And upcoming thanksgiving.

You too. 👍🏼

 

[newnan man]

I respect And welcome everyone's Opinion, Whether they are. right or wrong. I can't assure you that
The archeologist that held them in his hand And examined them, made a correct Decision when Informing me that they are indeed worked stones. Going off of photographs I'm sure it is sometimes hard to make a correct Decision On the subject Of worked or not worked Stone.
Regardless I thank you for your opinion.
Have a great day And happy holidays. Turkey day is just around the corner.

In all due respect, how can you assure us that the archeologist is in fact correct? Because you know him? You want to believe him? What is his expirence in the field? Those rocks show zero pecking, grinding, or wear use. What would their use as a tool be? Google pictures of stone axes, mauls, adzes, pestles, hammerstones etc. and the made made factors leaps out plain as day.

 

[Charl]

They may not be plow scars, but they certainly do resemble implement strikes. They are much fresher than the surface of the stone. They lack the patina that the rest of the stone displays, so therefore they are fresher than the stone’s surface. Otherwise, does not resemble any tool, and seems to be simply a rock.

 

[Charl]

In all due respect, how can you assure us that the archeologist is in fact correct? Because you know him? You want to believe him? What is his expirence in the field? Those rocks show zero pecking, grinding, or wear use. What would their use as a tool be? Google pictures of stone axes, mauls, adzes, pestles, hammerstones etc. and the made made factors leaps out plain as day.

The archaeologist is clearly mistaken, but who can say why. I have seen archaeologists humor people. It’s not right, but some just don’t like to disappoint people. Whatever the reason, the archaeologist was wrong, they are all rocks, not artifacts. If posted to the Native American artifact forum, that would be the conclusion from collectors with hundreds of years collective experience. Further, most would interpret the lighter scrapes as implement strikes. None would conclude any of the rocks were worked. Nor would better photos be required to conclude they were not artifacts….

 

[mike b]

Great clear, detailed pictures!

 

[newnan man]

Hey Charl, it's about time for you to post some of your nice finds.

 

[Treasure_Hunter]

Fossils are nice, the rocks are natural stone.

 

[Almy]

Just a thought, if the waterway where they were found is large enough for a motorboat, could the marks be from propellers?