Nokta Invenio vs. Nokta GoldenKing

audreamer

Greenie
Dec 11, 2018
18
17
Primary Interest:
Cache Hunting
I used to own the Makro Jeohunter 3D Dual System and have experience with the Nokta GoldenKing Plus. The large sized coil was always inconvenient because it took two people walking in unison to wield it properly. But there was a significant increase in depth penetration between the medium and large sized coils so if you wanted to look deeper you had to use it. I spoke with a dealer about the Nokta Invenio yesterday and got to see it in person. Nice looking detector with craftsmanship that seems top of the line. According to him, the large sized coil on the Invenio can now be wielded by one person due to its decrease in size/weight, yet the depth penetration has increased by 1-2 meters more than the large sized coils on the Jeohunter and GoldenKing. If this is true it is a very significant upgrade. Can someone from Nokta confirm these claims? What is maximum depth penetration with the large sized coil on the Invenio? It would be helpful to have a depth chart describing what size objects can be detected at what depths with each coil. Thanks
 

Just another question if I could squeeze it in to the same thread. The video of the Nokta Invenio producing a real-time high resolution image of underground objects is impressive. But those were basically surface coins and other metallic objects buried no more than a few inches from the surface. My question is do the medium and large sized coils continue producing high resolution images of objects buried deeper underground? For example, would a 2 x 3 FT box of silver buried 10 FT underground produce an image of a symmetrical rectangular object during real-time scanning? Thanks
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top