PegLeg,
I think we are all waiting for YOU to prove US wrong! Everyone is just tired of hearing these fantastic theories you spout as FACT!
I am not one to cast negative comments here, and anyone who has been here long can vouch for my reputation. I have always tried to be civil and polite so please don't take these comments the wrong way. I love your enthusiasm and your desire to find this GHOST WRECK! But your stories have changed so many times it is getting to be absurd!
Sit back and relaxe here at TreasureNet. Continue your search. I have no doubt you have something of interest. But lets leave it at that! You have absolutely no proof of any of the claims you have made. All of your evidence is circumstantial, 2nd hand or hearsay at best!
I think you have some info on these three wrecks that may be in the general vicinity of your area, and you are for the most part, looking to find them. Is this true? From your side scans and 2nd hand (eye witness accounts) feel you have located the general vicinity of the first wreck? Is this true? Now you have some documentation on two additional wrecks in the same area (or roughly 1 sq mile) of the first? True?
The one that I have already located because of the structure is from the early 1800's.
What structure? How can you say you have determined the wreck to be from the 1800's? Have you recovered anything? How can you say the vessel is no more than 55ft in length? Have you found it? On what basis do you make these claims? Just because you know there were ships that sank in the area doesn't mean this is it! Again, You have NO proof!
I am asking all these questions to bring some realization to what you are claiming.
I for one have no problem with your theory about a vessel(s) being pushed into a river by a storm. Sounds doable under the right circumstances, but I don' t know the terrain or bottom features of the area in question.
As for now, do a Mag survey, more side scan, sub-bottom profile or just MD on the banks of the area you feel most likely to be your target! See if you cant find and recover (or photograph) some artifacts to show everyone here. Make fools out of all the nay sayers.
I think what irritates some members is the fact you are claiming to have found the wreck and are now spouting out so called FACTS about it, when the truth is, you have not located anything definitive yet. Even if we all agreed that your side scans did show a shipwreck, you can not make the claims you have made here recently without further evidence.
For now, just relaxe the subject and these fantastic claims!
Lets leave it at "You have some info on several wrecks in your area you are trying to locate and need some help!" Maybe start a new post with exactly that heading and explain your search to date. Talk about the ships in question and see if anyone has any input or research to corroborate your site. Just a thought!
Good Luck,
Robert in SC