Sorry but it is a nutting stone, per an archeologist with Univ. of Tennessee and just like the one they have on display at McClung Museum of Natural History on the campus of University of Tennessee in Knoxville.Sorry but it's not a Nutting stone...imo
Sorry but it is a nutting stone, per an archeologist with Univ. of Tennessee and just like the one they have on display at McClung Museum of Natural History on the campus of University of Tennessee in Knoxville.
True but you need to realize he found it in Tennessee. If you search Omar’s they are found in the north not the south. It could be a fossil of some kind that I don’t much about.Let me clear this up for you.
For many years, such stones as you have WERE identified as " nutting stones ." That picture is probably an old I.D. in the museum, or from someone not informed.
Omarolluks , or just Omars, are what these natural stones really are. They are cool to find & keep, but not genuine artifacts. Look at this link ;
Omarolluks - Google Search
www.google.com
Yes, those are mostly found in the North . How it got to Tn., or if they were naturally made in Tn., is a question. As an example, you can find Native American points in areas thousands of miles away from where the materiel to make them is naturally located.True but you need to realize he found it in Tennessee. If you search Omar’s they are found in the north not the south. It could be a fossil of some kind that I don’t much about.
And the discussion continues. So if it a Omar and was found in Tennessee it would of had to be carried in by man to the location it was found. And therefore it would be considered a Portable which would be a Artifact. I rest my caseYes, those are mostly found in the North . How it got to Tn., or if they were naturally made in Tn., is a question. As an example, you can find Native American points in areas thousands of miles away from where the materiel to make them is naturally located.
There are similarly marked stones made by a type of boring clam called " Pholads." Look up " Pholad borings." But, I still say it is an Omar.
Could have been moved by glaciers too. There are no signs on the rock of being worked and the patina is the same at bottom of divit as top of rock, if worked it should be different.And the discussion continues. So if it a Omar and was found in Tennessee it would of had to be carried in by man to the location it was found. And therefore it would be considered a Portable which would be a Artifact. I rest my case