Possibly but from what I’ve read the glaciers and Omar’s are only up north. I’m not disagreeing with anyone I’m just trying to state facts. It could very well be some kind of fossil as I stated I’m no fossil expert at all.Could have been moved by glaciers too. There are no signs on the rock of being worked and the patina is the same at bottom of divit as top of rock, if worked it should be different.
Point is there are no signs of being touched, worked or used by man. Just cleaning it would not make patina the same and uniform, there are also no signs of heavy scrubbing to clean either.Possibly but from what I’ve read the glaciers and Omar’s are only up north. I’m not disagreeing with anyone I’m just trying to state facts. It could very well be some kind of fossil as I stated I’m no fossil expert at all.
Now as far as the patina goes for all we know it has been cleaned. Original OP never said if they cleaned it with harsh stuff. I know some people will use lemon juice which is a acid.
I’m glad you know cause we don’t have them here in the creeks or fields at least not in my area. You have a world of knowledgeIt's not a fossil. Natural formation. It's not even rare. Those types of formations/ water erosion are very common in various places on earth.
Great find! And I also got to learn what a nutting stone was and how it was used! It's amazing how one find can lead to so much education. Thanks for posting it.FoundView attachment 2077566 in SE Tennessee; too bad it was in two pieces.
I've heard similar arguments and agree with yours as well. Breaking a nut in a cup then means you have to dig out the meat with the shells. Seems like a lot of useless effort.well here's my 2 cents.
i never bought the nutting stone idea, especially when experts kept telling me that's how they cracked their acorns.
They were eating chestnuts, the tree dominated the forest, and fed every animal that lived there.
even so, a flat rock is all you would need.
A flint knapper wrote an interesting article for the Ohio Archeologist, he said a deer antler is still the best tool for knapping, and the flint tears it up rather quickly, so you need to dress it.
The best way to do this, is ti twist it back and forth on a sandstone, as it makes a cup, it works even better, until it gets too deep. Then you start another hole.
This makes sense to me, but old theories die hard, and I'm surprised at the collectors that won't even consider this as a theory.
I need to find an example of one of mine and take photographs. One side has full cups, and the reverse side has only the cup bottoms; around the cup bottoms are small divots where the stone was refaced removing the walls of the cups. Pretty convincing to me.well here's my 2 cents.
i never bought the nutting stone idea, especially when experts kept telling me that's how they cracked their acorns.
They were eating chestnuts, the tree dominated the forest, and fed every animal that lived there.
even so, a flat rock is all you would need.
A flint knapper wrote an interesting article for the Ohio Archeologist, he said a deer antler is still the best tool for knapping, and the flint tears it up rather quickly, so you need to dress it.
The best way to do this, is ti twist it back and forth on a sandstone, as it makes a cup, it works even better, until it gets too deep. Then you start another hole.
This makes sense to me, but old theories die hard, and I'm surprised at the collectors that won't even consider this as a theory.