Charl,
Could it have been traded from NC with a personal twist on design...perhaps a left handed hunter..?
I assume you are referring to our New England Hardaway-Dalton type. The Dalton tradition is unknown in New England. Meaning, I guess, no large Dalton sites, with everything associated with Dalton. But, isolated finds are a different story. And I have seen some killer no-brainer Dalton points. With only isolated surface finds of the style we call Hardaway-Dalton, and, for the most part, little resemblance to the Hardaway-Dalton of North Carolina, I don’t know how we reconstruct a relationship.
Most classic NC Hardaway-Daltons have those attractive, recurved ears. Our version does not. Our Hardaway Side Notch finds do have Hardaway- like ears, but, even there, I have only seen a few New England Hardaway Side Notch points that would pass easily as the type if found in North Carolina. Personally, I don’t believe we should have ever adopted that Southeast point type name, namely Hardaway-Dalton, at all. Our Hardaway-Daltons deserve their own, unique name. Which will be a site name, if an undisturbed, datable site containing our New England style is ever found and studied. I do believe it is safe to assume our New England Hardaway-Daltons are at least Early Archaic, maybe appearing in Late Paleo. Though, generally, the Southeast type forms, like Kirk, probably appear here with more recent dates than Kirks and other Early Archaic types from the Southeast.
Right now, it just is not possible to say what the relationship is between our Hardaway-Dalton points, and the classic form from NC.