Kenjmor2006
Full Member
- #1
Thread Owner
I was there the next day, talked to the landowners. No one had dug on their property. No one had dug under a boulder in the church yard as they claimed. Fake news.
Lots of Churches in that area. Lots of boulders too. Maybe someone just made a mistake.
In the words of Union General Ulysses Simpson Grant: "I'll drink to that"!.... these are Covfefe related...
I'll have a double if you please.
First, as has been detailed many times before, there are many ways that the names and residences of 30 men could be contained in so few codes, per example, if they all lived in one area, if several of them shared the same last name, etc., etc. So grabbing from the hat here is just that, grabbing the hat that suits.
Second, do you even realize just how many documents and writings could be used to generate a list of names using the same assumed process? It's virtually limitless, which is why so many proclaimed solves exist, by similar methods and others.
You've trapped yourself in that same numbers game like so many before you, never realizing the number of possible number/alphabet relationships that can be made to exist. Again, virtually limitless and open to individual suiting.
All of this is pretty common knowledge these days thanks to the internet.
You must be mistaking me for someone else as I have, in the past, posted in length the various ways in which 30 names and residences could be contained in C3. The same being true of C1, the location being easily contained in but a single sentence. On the other hand, there is absolutely no evidence at this point to assume that both contain anything other then meaningless random numbers that still continue to bait and fool hopeful solvers today.I am glad you now see it possible for all those names to be contained in the page 3!