Re: relics Vs wheaties and silver "rosies"
It's all about "providence". I mean, take for example a British fellow reading about a 200 yr. old bust coin or button or whatever, found at the earliest site in your city. To him, a "200 yr. old item" would seem like new child's play, right? (because they're used to chasing 1000 to 2000 yr. old stuff where they're at). And likewise: if you read about their roman broaches, saxon gold, etc... "what good does that do you?" (unless you intend to fly over).
So it's the same for us USA hunters: a deeeeep barber or seated or sherrif's badge with a particular city or name on it, might bring BIG "atteboys" from guys in that particular state, or guys who have tried that particular park/school/beach, etc.... but you managed to bag that elusive thingie, while they must've missed it.
This is why state specific forums are so appropriate. The value and challenge of age-site-specific artifiacts vary from locale to locale. I could care less about CW buckles or buttons, while someone from S. Carolina would probably salivate at the chance of one-upping his buddies with such a find. Likewise they would probably yawn at the thought of seateds or busts found in CA (since they're after colonial coppers or whatever in their locales).