Tuscoro said:Some would call it an arrow head, however it appears to be a specific tool or specific design used for fishing, I would venture to say you found it in or around an old or existing river bed as it appears to be worn by water, No?
ldmorrill said:ROCK
Neanderthal said:It does look modified, the side in the second pic shows what looks to be heavy grinding. Look closely at the striations and you will see that whatever ground them down was in a circular fashion. My first impression was that somebody was using a circular tool to make pseudo flake scars. I have seen many authentic ground stone points. However, I personally have never seen an authentic "aboriginal" one done in that fashion. I have seen some that were done like that in modern times though.
Neanderthal said:It does look modified, the side in the second pic shows what looks to be heavy grinding. Look closely at the striations and you will see that whatever ground them down was in a circular fashion. My first impression was that somebody was using a circular tool to make pseudo flake scars. I have seen many authentic ground stone points. However, I personally have never seen an authentic "aboriginal" one done in that fashion. I have seen some that were done like that in modern times though.
pickaway said:Neanderthal said:It does look modified, the side in the second pic shows what looks to be heavy grinding. Look closely at the striations and you will see that whatever ground them down was in a circular fashion. My first impression was that somebody was using a circular tool to make pseudo flake scars. I have seen many authentic ground stone points. However, I personally have never seen an authentic "aboriginal" one done in that fashion. I have seen some that were done like that in modern times though.
must agree... must![]()
Neanderthal said:The semi-circular striations on your image, look at it closely. That is generally caused from a circular implement cutting or grinding. Take a dremel rotary tool with a drum wheel on it (or any grinder really) and touch it to an object and you will get similar "groovy" results. If it's layered material then that could account for some of it, but it doesn't explain the furrows or grooves.
ldmorrill said:ROCK
Yes,exactly . Thats why i dont understand them being closed. If i never seen Indiane artifacts, i would be able to read people =s post and make my own determination . I would see the cloud reading stuff and flint stuff and make my own call.Isn't that what was happening in the threads you referenced as being hateful?