- #1
Thread Owner
Though Tom and I do not agree, that disagreement is unimportant to me. I see him as "shooting from the hip", that is, acting on minimum information with great energy.
Isn't that the almost normal behavior of TN folks? I sure would not criticize the way things are normally done. A lot of folks here have a lot of fun with spur of the moment hunting. Yes, I call it shooting from the hip, but do not mean that in a nasty way.
Tom went on a lengthy vacation in that mode. And, I suspect he had a great time. He would not want to be where I am, looking at a suspected gigantic treasure with absolutely no opportunity to explore. But, he clearly enjoyed what seemed like a great vacation.
The only issue involved here was he read a few of my postings, and assumed that I also was shooting from the hip, believing the mental wanderings of a bunch of drunks. That is not the case, it's called projection. In fact, I explained in great detail all my research and my conclusions, even put up my own weakest evidence.
I am not sure I am explaining this very well, and have no intent to offend Tom. But, my opinion is based on a 30 year study, though I cannot supply more without outing myself. But, it is totally unfair to dismiss my study as gullible acceptance of a few folks. It simply is not so.
Isn't that the almost normal behavior of TN folks? I sure would not criticize the way things are normally done. A lot of folks here have a lot of fun with spur of the moment hunting. Yes, I call it shooting from the hip, but do not mean that in a nasty way.
Tom went on a lengthy vacation in that mode. And, I suspect he had a great time. He would not want to be where I am, looking at a suspected gigantic treasure with absolutely no opportunity to explore. But, he clearly enjoyed what seemed like a great vacation.
The only issue involved here was he read a few of my postings, and assumed that I also was shooting from the hip, believing the mental wanderings of a bunch of drunks. That is not the case, it's called projection. In fact, I explained in great detail all my research and my conclusions, even put up my own weakest evidence.
I am not sure I am explaining this very well, and have no intent to offend Tom. But, my opinion is based on a 30 year study, though I cannot supply more without outing myself. But, it is totally unfair to dismiss my study as gullible acceptance of a few folks. It simply is not so.