I do not have military experience.
It would seem to me, if you owned a very expensive ship, traversing potentially hazardous waters,
an armed guard would be good policy.
The tanker holds 2bn barrels, 100m bucks.
Voyage duration of 4 to 6 weeks.
Perhaps a 3 man contingent to sit 8hr watches.
Seems to me, an M-60 machine gun, at commanding elevation, would more than suffice to deal with evil spirits in small boats wielding AK's and RPG's.
Place one at the bow, stern, and advantageous point on the superstructure.
Cost: Probably 100k per trip. Including a hazardous duty term insurance policy.
My guess is an ad in the New York or London Times could generate a significant response from qualified individuals at even a better price!
Now if they step up to stinger missiles, or Tow missiles, you're probably gonna need .50 caliber to keep 'em a little bit further away. Not too big a deal, but there is more risk. They haven't gotten that far yet.
My guess is Blackwater has a proposition sitting on their desk as we talk about it.
My guess is the shipowners are just a bunch of skinflints and not willing to spring for a nickel they don't absolutely need to. When the insurance for a voyage goes up, they will be forced to change.
...Of course that's all paying top dollar.
Probably get an armed contingent out of afghanistan for your boat a whole lot cheaper!
Twenty goats and three camels for a months work? plus the air fare?
