Ok ..
I am a little suprised that the AT pro was suggested to be better, I have the G 2 and have used the AT Pro and the G 2 is by far better, I started this thread to see if other users shared my opinion.
What bothers me a little is the AT pro being advertised as a Beach detector, which is not entirely true, the G2 once correctly ground balanced is a dream in wet sand and exceeds the AT quite a bit, The AT can be used in wet sand but is less stable and at the cost of sacrificing depth and sensibility, I do like the AT Pro but it is defenately not a so called wet sand detector neither is the G 2 allthough in its class is about the best, the AT for inland and fresh water / rivers is another thing intirely, and does excell.
I just consider the AT when advertised as a Beach detector to be a little misleading and I know of many people whom have bought it for wet sand detecting ( as advertised ) to then be very dissapointed and frankly annoyed that it was sold to them as that, it should state that it is a fresh water detector, but can be used in salt water allthough not recomended.
Please don´t take this the wrong way I an by no means Anti AT, it is a lovely machine but I am a little anti mis leading advertising, money doesn´t grow on trees and is earnt through hard work, and one cannot afford to invest in a tool which isn´t realy the tool for the job..