Another unanswered question has been added to the list, so here is the new list---
Only one LRL user, Eddie, has given rational answers to the questions (admitting that Carl's test is fair, and that he probably could not pass it).
The Questions LRLers Refuse to Answer
1. Why don't you take Carl's test?
2. What do you feel is wrong with
Carl's double-blind test?
3. What do you think is a fair test?
4. What average percentage of success do LRLs consistently and reliably have, under optimum conditions?
5. Art's idea of a fair test is for 30 people, "like the drug companies." But he won't answer the following question: All 30 people searching for the same target at once, 10 at a time, 1 at a time; or all 30 searching for 30 targets all at once, or
what?
6. Why are there no treasures documented to be found with LRLs? Especially in the U.K., where they are paid for their finds by the government? We see found treasures in the news, but none were found with LRLs! If LRLs are so much better than standard metal detectors, there should be even more than with detectors, but there is
none. Why is that?
7. Why don't you want any LRL to be
tested by a University of
your choice?
8. Why won't your LRL follow a moving target when the handle is clamped to a rigid object?
9. Why won't you give a demonstration of your LRL in a random double-blind test, at your local metal detector club or high school science class?
Number one leads to number two, and two leads to three.
Number four should be common knowledge, because the LRL promoters brag continuously.
Number five is just con-artie's way of not answering.
Number six is so obvious, they won't even try to give a phony answer!
Number seven---so far they have just pretended that seven doesn't even exist!
Number eight results in various nonsense excuses and insults, because there is no answer that won't admit that their LRLs are fake.
Nine has resulted in a simple "no," so far. Previously, travel to Carl's test, and distrust of Carl, has been their only excuses. So this solves both of those problems, but still no takers!
The LRL promoters
won't, under any circumstances, rationally
answer number three; because then they would have to take
that test which they described! Because if it were
their idea, they
can't disagree with it! And when they took their own test,
they would fail!
When asked #3, they
immediately turn to insults or purely nonsensical posts about
anything besides the subject at hand. So obvious!
But, this is their big chance (again), nonetheless....
Don't be a doof---show the proof!
P.S. When will you man-up and take
Carl's double-blind test, and collect the
$25,000.00?
ref:
Are LRLs More Than Just Dowsing?
However, I predict that the LRL promoters will simply spam the thread even more, merely to divert attention away from these logical issues.
Or they will claim that, "Carl's test is foo-foo," is a rational answer.
Or they will whine about electronics professionals supposedly being mean to them.
Or they will simply ignore this, and fail to reply.
So, let's see if they will snap back to reality, or remain in their fantasy world, shall we?
