Is the above letter in Kenneth Bauman's hand?
So far there have been NO actual solves just endless claim jibber jabber about Reavis, Poe, Lafitte, Emerson, Edison, and Ken adding Amundsen's Shakespeare code for good measure, red knee spiders, Nova Scotia, Peralta Stones, Lost Dutchman, "TJB" initials carved across the American landscape, and anything else that is totally unrelated to Ward's 1885 published Beale Papers dime novel.
And again nothing but denial from individuals that have never once posted anything physical
I think you know how armchair that seems...... to be trashing someone's discoveries as they appear....one after the next, and not once did you guys offer a single piece of research into ANY of the ciphers.
Ten years from now you'll still be hitting those same doors....
And again nothing but denial from individuals that have never once posted anything physical
I think you know how armchair that seems...... to be trashing someone's discoveries as they appear....one after the next, and not once did you guys offer a single piece of research into ANY of the ciphers.
All you could have possibly known "as fact" was that the story was presented by an unnamed author in 1885 and that the story contained two alleged unsolved ciphers containing completely random numbers. Anything else you may have started with was just "preconceived notion." No wonder that all of these solutions end up with solutions based on those preconceived notions.
Really? Then you've not been reading much.....only promoting what you select and completely avoiding all of the "posted" contrary facts. So let me ask you, Eldo, what facts did you know about the story and cipher before you began your work? What did Ken know?
While you are sitting in your armchair, do you still maintain that Reavis wrote the Beale Papers, and what about those 30 bodies you mentioned all the time?
....good Lord man, I've already explained your entire process, also how, and why, and as a matter of scientific fact, it's possible for you and others to arrive at your manufactured solutions from all of the complete unknowns. Do your research, check it out for yourself and then you'll understand how I know all of this is, in fact, a matter of fact. You'll also find numerous pieces of research, as well as several factual revelations regarding all of the inaccuracies in the narration, and the variances in the ciphers, etc. Unlike you, and others, I actual researched the details in the original source materials themselves before I allowed myself to run off wild under the influence of wild personal fantasies. 
If Ken is absolutely right would yo say that makes the SIMPSON PAPERS absolutely wrong?
Where are the "FACTS" that confirm this "breakthrough"?
....A) none of your claimed factual connections actually exist..., and B) "the same old facts" still remain as "the facts." So in just this one post you've pretty much summed up the true situation as it really is, some deal in "the same existing facts" while others keep trying to manufacture their own set of evidences from their 500 Lego Blocks while completely ignoring "the same old facts." Thanks for clearing all that up and finally speaking the truth. 
Apparently people like you don't have these wonderful confirming breakthrough facts.
Thanks for the acknowledgement and compliment. Yes, what I post is pretty apparent, obvious, and clear. Thanks again for finally acknowledging that...
What is conspicuous is all the posts you made trying to convince all here that you made this great breakthrough with the Beale ciphers that Eldo claims was created by forger James Reavis and Laf claims contains a Grand Fret epitaph.
*YAWN* 
