OBXmetalDet
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 25, 2019
- Messages
- 111
- Reaction score
- 65
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Detector(s) used
- Minelab Equinox 800
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
- #1
Thread Owner
I recently read a reply that involved talking about the CoA on a thread posted by the famous Black Bart. As I thought more about the CoA, this really seemed to put a lot of things together. If I understand how the CoA works, I can see how it prevents the average person from profiting from treasure hunting.
Therefore, I thought it might be beneficial to start a thread about the CoA in an attempt to bring everything together so that the big picture will become clearer.
There are some things about the CoA that I believe I understand (and I want to make sure) and some things regarding the CoA that I have questions about.
For clarity I’m going to list my concerns point by point that way it will be easier for anybody to reference to any given point(s).
1. Who issues a CoA? Is it the state?
2. In order to be granted a CoA for your find, is it true to say that you have to licensed by the state or you need to have a permit issued to you by the state?
3. In Florida, detecting on the beach is legal. Let’s say I found a Spanish coin at Vero Beach from the 1715 fleet. Now I want to get a CoA for my find. How can I do that?
4. Suppose somebody (a corrupt person) who is licensed to dive on a leased site comes to the state of Florida with a replica coin seeking to get a CoA for that. In this case a CoA should not be granted because it’s a replica, but given all the corruption I am learning about, surely there are cases where a CoA has been granted when it should not have been, maybe because the person granting the CoA was paid to look the other way (corruption at its finest). Are there any know cases like this? If so, wouldn’t this make the CoA unreliable?
5a. Is this how the process works:
License or permit granted by the state > State issues CoA > Sell artifact at full market value
5b. As I understand it, people are not supposed to remove any artifacts that are older than 50 years old from underwater (the beach is apparently ok since you’re allowed to detect the beach). If somebody did remove an artifact from underwater that was older than 50 years old (and there were not licensed by the state), when they go to sell that artifact, is it true to say they will need a CoA to get the full market value of that artifact?
5c. In this case since the person wasn’t licensed (or didn’t have a permit) they would not have been granted a CoA. And because they would not be granted a CoA they would not get the full market value of their find. Do I have this right?
6. In essence, the requirement of a CoA (if you want to sell your artifact for full market value) ultimately has the effect (and probably the intention) of preventing ordinary people from profiting off of sunken treasure finds, because to get a CoA you need to be licensed (or have a permit?) which is at the full discretion of the state and the state will probably not grant you a license since they don’t want you in the game. Is this how it works?
Therefore, I thought it might be beneficial to start a thread about the CoA in an attempt to bring everything together so that the big picture will become clearer.
There are some things about the CoA that I believe I understand (and I want to make sure) and some things regarding the CoA that I have questions about.
For clarity I’m going to list my concerns point by point that way it will be easier for anybody to reference to any given point(s).
1. Who issues a CoA? Is it the state?
2. In order to be granted a CoA for your find, is it true to say that you have to licensed by the state or you need to have a permit issued to you by the state?
3. In Florida, detecting on the beach is legal. Let’s say I found a Spanish coin at Vero Beach from the 1715 fleet. Now I want to get a CoA for my find. How can I do that?
4. Suppose somebody (a corrupt person) who is licensed to dive on a leased site comes to the state of Florida with a replica coin seeking to get a CoA for that. In this case a CoA should not be granted because it’s a replica, but given all the corruption I am learning about, surely there are cases where a CoA has been granted when it should not have been, maybe because the person granting the CoA was paid to look the other way (corruption at its finest). Are there any know cases like this? If so, wouldn’t this make the CoA unreliable?
5a. Is this how the process works:
License or permit granted by the state > State issues CoA > Sell artifact at full market value
5b. As I understand it, people are not supposed to remove any artifacts that are older than 50 years old from underwater (the beach is apparently ok since you’re allowed to detect the beach). If somebody did remove an artifact from underwater that was older than 50 years old (and there were not licensed by the state), when they go to sell that artifact, is it true to say they will need a CoA to get the full market value of that artifact?
5c. In this case since the person wasn’t licensed (or didn’t have a permit) they would not have been granted a CoA. And because they would not be granted a CoA they would not get the full market value of their find. Do I have this right?
6. In essence, the requirement of a CoA (if you want to sell your artifact for full market value) ultimately has the effect (and probably the intention) of preventing ordinary people from profiting off of sunken treasure finds, because to get a CoA you need to be licensed (or have a permit?) which is at the full discretion of the state and the state will probably not grant you a license since they don’t want you in the game. Is this how it works?