About the Cordoba fleet.
Thanks for correcting the date.
As to where the shipwrecks are, please give me some time to check the available information. This is the purpose of this thread.
Old documents are difficult to read, but even much more difficult to interpret. It is not only a matter of language, but also a matter of deeper understanding many factors that influenced the way the story was written down.
I doubt if one single person can have all the knowledge to successfully interpret a story like the sinking of the Cordoba Fleet.
For example:
It needs profound knowledge of the prevailing wind and weather conditions in the region, at the time of the year, that is the beginning of November. And was this a usual weather pattern year? Was this an exceptional storm? Do we have any information about unusual current or wind patterns?
Profound knowledge of the navigation the way it was done in those times.
Knowledge of sailing in the times.
Understanding of conditions on board a ship, in the darkness, in a howling storm, with the only light being the flashes of lightning.
Understanding the psychological condition of the surviving eyewitnesses, during the time they are describing and during the time they are responding to the inquirer.
The list can go on and on. Each one of these factors may produce information that can be wrongly interpreted at the time of the depositions as well as in modern times.
So forgive me if I want to go over the publicly known information with a team of experts in the different fields before deciding on the priority search area.
I have noticed that there are quite a few people on this forum who have dedicated time and accumulated experience in interpreting shipwreck information. Why don't we listen to all of them. Let's see what the opinion of each one is and how he came to his conclusions.
We all might learn something by listening to all the different opinions, not just one or to.
CP