Everyone should check out that blog again....
It took about a week to let any opposing views be heard...and they all got a "canned response". Mine was written the same time the others were, but was "sat on" for a while.
I urge others to post a comment on there (hopefully calm, and well thought-out), to let them know that it's not a one-sided issue.
Be sure to read what all they wrote, and address them. They act like the main reason to deny the permit system is because the artifacts are a finite, non-renewable source....not like hunting and fishing....but fail to realize that almost any animal can be hunted to extinction, as some have, and that the current fossil permits allow collecting of a similar non-renewable source with no problems. It's safe to say that most stone artifacts that were ever made, exist in some form today, and most will never be unearthed....historical era artifacts are also likely to remain hidden in a lot of areas, but some are subject to deterioration.
The point that "Most finds are not isolated" is laughable! They are talking about a point found in the river! It is true that some sites have been excavated in rivers, but this is typical of someone that "Knows more than you" trying to "bamboozle" us!