Used AI to restore broken point. Amazing!

[knapper1492]

This point was posted earlier in original state. I had AI restore it based on what it could see-pretty darn good. It’s clearly reworked, but now not sure if it’s bifurcate or say brewerton. From far NE Illinois. It’s a bit over 1” restored so it’s certainly bifurcate size for lecroy but the base is off. What do the experts say with the restored image?

 

[Tesorodeoro]

Ask it what it looked like prior to fabrication. I bet that’s convincing as well if your mind is open to suggestions. Are you sure it wasn’t like this previously?

 

[knapper1492]

The original point is on the left. I used Claude

 

[Tesorodeoro]

The original point is on the left. I used Claude

I wasn’t intending to be a donkey. Just that I feel AI is the guillotine of reality and I’ve got a bad taste for it despite the great benefits humanity may reap.

Great point though. It’s been a long time since I’ve looked down and found anything.

 

[opalboy]

I think that’s really cool, it’s a good tool!

 

[Tesorodeoro]

I think that’s really cool, it’s a good tool!

The artifact or artificial reality (AR)?

 

[knapper1492]

Ok-I’ve used Claude to help enhance the flake scars to show better visual. One of the feedback I got was to show that better. Also both sides are shown. It’s one inch long. Can someone tell me for certain if this is more archaic or woodland? It’s reworked with parallel pressure flaking scars on one surface. Any help appreciated

 

[Hellbilly]

Id say mid to late archaic.

 

[knapper1492]

Id say mid to late archaic.

That’s my thinking. There are a lot of similarities to late woodland as well. For me it’s hard to tell the difference