Vaquero with the 5.75 concentric coil
- Thread starter toasted
- Start date
- Joined
- May 28, 2010
- Messages
- 20,360
- Reaction score
- 32,344
- Golden Thread
- 1
- Location
- White Plains, New York
- 🥇 Banner finds
- 1
- 🏆 Honorable Mentions:
- 1
- Detector(s) used
- Nokta Makro Legend// Pulsedive// Minelab GPZ 7000// Vanquish 540// Minelab Pro Find 35// Dune Kraken Sandscoop// Grave Digger Tools Tombstone shovel & Sidekick digger// Bunk's Hermit Pick
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
Stay with the stock coil
Welgund
Sr. Member
In high modern trash areas it is a great coil and an excellent one to have in your arsenal.
luvsdux
Bronze Member
- Joined
- May 16, 2007
- Messages
- 1,767
- Reaction score
- 690
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Lewiston, Idaho
- Detector(s) used
- Multiple Tesoros and Whites
- Primary Interest:
- Metal Detecting
I agree with Welgund. In my opinion the depth is quite good for its size and it does slip through the trash pretty well.
luvsdux
luvsdux
atomicscott
Bronze Member
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2011
- Messages
- 1,564
- Reaction score
- 1,055
- Golden Thread
- 0
- Location
- Riverside CA
- Detector(s) used
- Current: Nokta Makro Simplex+, Teknetics Patriot, Fisher Gold Bug (original), GP Pinpointer (Garrett Clone) Lesche. Owned: Omega 8000, Minelab X-Terra 505, Fisher F2, Tesoro Vaquero, & Compadre, Whit
- Primary Interest:
- All Treasure Hunting
I found the 5.75 widescan to be 1/2" less depth than the stock coil. The separation is much better in the trash & it handles high mineralized ground better. I preferred it over the stock coil. It does hit hard on iron though.
Top Member Reactions
-
2225 -
1591 -
1393 -
1248 -
1201 -
1063 -
989 -
782 -
776 -
615 -
567 -
540 -
526 -
497 -
487
