What an interesting marble.

Brian C.

Bronze Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,271
1,330
Detector(s) used
Whites and Garrett. I use several machines, the ace 350 is a nice machine. I have a 5900, 6000, whites.
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting

Attachments

  • IMG_0314.jpg
    IMG_0314.jpg
    38.2 KB · Views: 380
  • IMG_0308.jpg
    IMG_0308.jpg
    39.8 KB · Views: 367
  • IMG_0310.jpg
    IMG_0310.jpg
    38.3 KB · Views: 369
  • IMG_0311.jpg
    IMG_0311.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 379

creeper71

Silver Member
Dec 5, 2007
2,936
61
South Central PA
Re: Bear on a tree branch.

I think you should change your subject line title you might get more replies... that is a neat marble but I can't help you...
 

cheese

Silver Member
Jan 9, 2005
3,332
1,090
South Georgia
Re: Bear on a tree branch.

It's hard to tell from that pic, but it sure looks like it is a sulphide. They are very collectible, and amber ones can command premiums.
 

OP
OP
Brian C.

Brian C.

Bronze Member
Jan 14, 2011
1,271
1,330
Detector(s) used
Whites and Garrett. I use several machines, the ace 350 is a nice machine. I have a 5900, 6000, whites.
Primary Interest:
Relic Hunting
Re: Bear on a tree branch.

cheese said:
It's hard to tell from that pic, but it sure looks like it is a sulphide. They are very collectible, and amber ones can command premiums.
This marble is not that old, no pontil on either end? It is just a neat find. :coffee2:
 

cheese

Silver Member
Jan 9, 2005
3,332
1,090
South Georgia
Ok, if you say so, but if you find a sulphide with an obvious pontil mark, chances are it is NOT old. The old sulphides had ground and polished pontils. Often times the pontil can't even be seen. The thing about yours though, is that it looks like it is pretty small. Some old sulphides were small but most were bigger than yours appears to be.
 

Top Member Reactions

Users who are viewing this thread

Top