Real de Tayopa Tropical Tramp said:
HI EE: it was posted in answer to your question -->***************
Naturally, each and every point in your post has been covered 'successfully' many times?? Obviously you also have a problem in comprehending the nuances in the Englsh language. That meant that they were all successfully countered. snicker.
Don Jose de La Mancha
I know what you meant, but the facts are that none of them have.
That's why they made the list in the first place!
When I found that they either continually changed the subject (usually with nonsense insults), or just outright said that they won't answer, after a few times of asking, I put those questions on the list.
They have never answered, and they never will....because they can't. The reason they can't is because it would then be obvious to prove they are lying. That's because once they commit to a definition, it can then be shown to be contradicting something else they have already said.
For instance, they won't actually commit to saying whether their LRL is a dowser, dowsing enhancer, or an all-electronically operated device. To wit: If they say it's a dowser, then the LRL is, like I have said, just dowsing; and if they say it's a dowsing enhancer, then that's false advertising; finally, if they say it's all-electronically operated, then it's a lie, because you can't clamp it in a vise and have it point to a moving target (even if you clamp it so you can still hold the handle, to provide "bio-energy"). So, if they define what it is, they lose, and they know it.
(But failing to define it, they have lost already, but just don't know it.)
Would
you care to answer that question?
I'm all ears....
: 
