kd5txx said:
If I have a bank account with them then they do work for me. The money they make off my account pays their paycheck. To put it into non banking terms..What if you grab a shirt at the store and just before you get it scanned the cashier takes it and says I am gonna buy this one cause I like the way it looks, you'll have to get another one. What would you do?
I disagree. Bank tellers, even if you have an account with their bank, do not work for you. They work for the people that you allow to hold on to your money. While the money that bank makes off your deposit(s) does indeed contribute to their salaries, that in no way makes them "your" employees. I contend that if you cannot fire them, give them a day off, or otherwise tell them what to do, then they in no way whatsoever work for you. If simply contributing to their salaries makes you their boss, then I guess I have millions of employees all over the world working for me. I think I'll give that nice kid that bags my groceries 2 weeks off with pay.
Banks are not a retail store. Those coins you see in the tellers' trays are nothing even resembling shirts for sale in a clothing store. The trays are there for the convenience of the teller and for counting purposes. Technically the individual coins in those trays aren't "for sale" like the shirts on a clothing rack. Just because you may be able to see them, that in no way entitles you to purchase them.
I do agree that tellers
should get any coins they wish to keep for themselves out of sight just to avoid confrontations...if they have the ability to do so. I know for a fact that some cannot do this. In some banks the policy is that tellers cannot remove any coins they wish to keep for themselves from their tray until their shift is over with a supervisor watching. Regardless, I believe that the teller should have first shot at any coins/notes that comes his/her way. "First come, first served" should apply here, and by default they were there first. "Taking" silver coins from a teller who wants them for his/herself would be no different than you being in line behind me in the bank, seeing me score some silver, then demanding that I relinquish them to you simply because you wanted them.
"Causing a fuss" may indeed score you a little silver that the teller didn't want to give up and that you otherwise wouldn't have gotten. However, it just makes CRHers look bad and is a horrible idea in my opinion. As a whole, CRHers are already not "cost effective" and a hassle to banks. They can shut us down anytime they wish. We should be appreciative of all the free services we receive. When we come across an uncooperative teller, we should just move on to the next bank. "Causing a fuss" could very well lead to changes in bank policies resulting in fewer CRH opportunities down the road...and thats never a good thing.
All just my opinion of course. Feel free to disagree.