Re: Why skeptics doesn't show proof?
aarthrj3811 said:
Oh and I repeat, bogus claims require legitimate proof. You STILL fail to prove anything. We are the ones that have nothing to prove, we just do so to tick you all off. :-D (and to read your crap rebuttals and laugh ourselves to sleep at night)
A confliction of fraud may help you..Art
And again we begin the process of going around in circles thanks to you.
Heres more..
http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/access-control.cgi/1998/980977.pdf
http://www.ih2000.net/ira/quad0422.htm
http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2007/03/the_doghouse_sn.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england/somerset/8634349.stm
Look up;
ADE 651, Alpha 6, GT200, Sniffex, Quadro Tracker, DKL lifeguard.
That's not to mention the DoD blanket ban on LRLs of any/all kind for ALL being found to be frauds; you can find that link in one of my older posts. (One of my posts before I got banned LAST time since the mods are heavily biased for LRLs).
Look up these companies owners, look up their track records, look up their education.
All of these people who make these products do not have the proper education to MAKE/INVENT (etc)
a device that can do what they claim they can do. You'll also find a few using false names and fake addresses, not to mention foreign addresses and IDs to cover up for when the poop hits the fan. The only reason you don't see MORE lawsuits and why YOU aren't in jail is because we make sure to let people know that these devices have been found to be a fraud 100% of the time. Most people aren't
--deleted-- or dumb, most DO ask, but I assure you most do not bother touching the subject of LRLs after speaking with me. I've made a good deal of money PROVING they do not work to engineering firms that try to use these for finding cavities underground or certain minerals, trust me, they are happy to have seen me disprove these machines by not using anything at all (dumb luck wins every time), its really not hard at all. So far I'm about 34/34 on companies that have asked me to prove/disprove these and have been successful every single time without a hitch. Out of these, I only know of about 3 that are/have filed lawsuits and last I heard one of there lawyers just outright told them it's not even worth the effort because the owner is broke and will go to jail before paying up, and even getting him jailed would be an issue. (I'm no lawyer so I don't mess with the legal aspects.) I have been lucky to be able to obtain some of these devices from these companies after they have realized they're a fraud and been able to oversee them getting taken apart in the company of 3-4 geotechnical engineers, electrical engineers, computer engineers, aeronautical engineers, etc... you name it. All reach a definite conclusion every single time, NONE of these devices can do what they claim to do.
You can claim these devices use a NEW science all you want, you can claim it's a field of science no one else knows about, you can make all these BOGUS and absurdly ridiculous claims all you want, but you cannot fool an educated person putting years of experience into this to see if these are legitimate or not, there's no way. You try to fool the unknowing... I'm not here to convince you, you know the truth, you're a part of the fraud!!! I'm here to show, not convince anyone, that these devices are an OUTRIGHT fraud, and so are the people behind them promoting them and trying to shove them down our throats. If I reach a point where I WOULD have to convince someone (like Art for instance) I don't bother trying to convince them because they're either too --
--deleted--, uneducated, or just plain dumb; or they're part of the fraud.
Anyways in regards to those links; There's plenty more but I'm not going to waste my time when theres so many others in these forums that the LRL kooks CHOOSE to ignore.
Don't bother with your worthless rebuttals, read those and weep.
